These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33433903)

  • 1. Interspecific introgression reveals a role of male genital morphology during the evolution of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    Frazee SR; Harper AR; Afkhami M; Wood ML; McCrory JC; Masly JP
    Evolution; 2021 May; 75(5):989-1002. PubMed ID: 33433903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
    LeVasseur-Viens H; Polak M; Moehring AJ
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1797-807. PubMed ID: 25962316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric mismatch in strain-specific genital morphology causes increased harm to Drosophila females.
    Masly JP; Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2014 Aug; 68(8):2401-11. PubMed ID: 24758304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila.
    Masly JP; Dalton JE; Srivastava S; Chen L; Arbeitman MN
    Genetics; 2011 Sep; 189(1):357-74. PubMed ID: 21750260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Major Locus Controls a Genital Shape Difference Involved in Reproductive Isolation Between Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila santomea.
    Peluffo AE; Nuez I; Debat V; Savisaar R; Stern DL; Orgogozo V
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2893-901. PubMed ID: 26511499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical incompatibility caused by modifications of multiple male genital structures using genomic introgression in Drosophila.
    Tanaka KM; Kamimura Y; Takahashi A
    Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2406-2418. PubMed ID: 30198555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drosophila pachea asymmetric lobes are part of a grasping device and stabilize one-sided mating.
    Rhebergen FT; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Dumont J; Schilthuizen M; Lang M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):176. PubMed ID: 27586247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple sexual selection pressures drive the rapid evolution of complex morphology in a male secondary genital structure.
    Frazee SR; Masly JP
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Oct; 5(19):4437-50. PubMed ID: 26664690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unraveling the Genetic Basis for the Rapid Diversification of Male Genitalia between Drosophila Species.
    Hagen JFD; Mendes CC; Booth SR; Figueras Jimenez J; Tanaka KM; Franke FA; Baudouin-Gonzalez L; Ridgway AM; Arif S; Nunes MDS; McGregor AP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Jan; 38(2):437-448. PubMed ID: 32931587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic architecture and functional characterization of genes underlying the rapid diversification of male external genitalia between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana.
    Tanaka KM; Hopfen C; Herbert MR; Schlötterer C; Stern DL; Masly JP; McGregor AP; Nunes MD
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 25783699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila.
    Manier MK; Lüpold S; Belote JM; Starmer WT; Berben KS; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Curr Biol; 2013 Oct; 23(19):1853-62. PubMed ID: 24076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sox21b underlies the rapid diversification of a novel male genital structure between Drosophila species.
    Ridgway AM; Hood EJ; Jimenez JF; Nunes MDS; McGregor AP
    Curr Biol; 2024 Mar; 34(5):1114-1121.e7. PubMed ID: 38309269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significance of constraints on genital coevolution: Why do female Drosophila appear to cooperate with males by accepting harmful matings?
    Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2016 Jul; 70(7):1674-83. PubMed ID: 27174423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predation-associated divergence of male genital morphology in a livebearing fish.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Langerhans RB
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 26(10):2135-45. PubMed ID: 23980714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of male genitalia: environmental and genetic factors affect genital morphology in two Drosophila sibling species and their hybrids.
    Soto IM; Carreira VP; Fanara JJ; Hasson E
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 May; 7():77. PubMed ID: 17504529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the post-copulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution reveals evidence for pleiotropic harm exerted by the male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae.
    Grieshop K; Polak M
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2676-86. PubMed ID: 25403358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex.
    Price CS; Kim CH; Gronlund CJ; Coyne JA
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 11263748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An innovative ovipositor for niche exploitation impacts genital coevolution between sexes in a fruit-damaging
    Muto L; Kamimura Y; Tanaka KM; Takahashi A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30257912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia.
    Polak M; Rashed A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 May; 277(1686):1371-6. PubMed ID: 20053645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeated evolution of asymmetric genitalia and right-sided mating behavior in the Drosophila nannoptera species group.
    Acurio AE; Rhebergen FT; Paulus S; Courtier-Orgogozo V; Lang M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 May; 19(1):109. PubMed ID: 31132984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.