These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33434081)

  • 1. A Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnosis Model with Ordinal Attributes for Dichotomous Response Data.
    Ma W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):408-421. PubMed ID: 33434081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.
    Ma W; Guo W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):370-392. PubMed ID: 30756389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):167-189. PubMed ID: 33449306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.
    Park YS; Xing K; Lee YS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):376-392. PubMed ID: 30034055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Sequential Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnostic Model.
    Zhang X; Wang J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579018. PubMed ID: 33117245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A general nonparametric classification method for multiple strategies in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Wang D; Ma W; Cai Y; Tu D
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):723-735. PubMed ID: 36814008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):253-275. PubMed ID: 27317397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.
    Ma W
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):167-181. PubMed ID: 32341605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Identifying Coexisting Skills and Misconceptions.
    Kuo BC; Chen CH; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 May; 42(3):179-191. PubMed ID: 29881120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on computing Louis' observed information matrix identity for IRT and cognitive diagnostic models.
    Liu CW; Chalmers RP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Feb; 74(1):118-138. PubMed ID: 32757460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Tutorial on Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Characterizing Mental Health Symptom Profiles Using Existing Item Responses.
    Tan Z; de la Torre J; Ma W; Huh D; Larimer ME; Mun EY
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):480-492. PubMed ID: 35113299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating Finite Mixtures of Ordinal Graphical Models.
    Lee KH; Chen Q; DeSarbo WS; Xue L
    Psychometrika; 2022 Mar; 87(1):83-106. PubMed ID: 34191228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Wang S; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):600-629. PubMed ID: 32816238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.