These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3343444)

  • 1. Sentence reception in noise from one versus two sources: effects of aging and hearing loss.
    Gelfand SA; Ross L; Miller S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jan; 83(1):248-56. PubMed ID: 3343444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the speech perception in noise (SPIN) test.
    Hutcherson RW; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1979; 87(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 503495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms.
    Frisina DR; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):95-104. PubMed ID: 9112109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.
    Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):401-8. PubMed ID: 11831813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Speech discrimination with separated signal sources and sound localization with speech stimuli : Learning effects and reproducibility].
    Buth S; Baljić I; Mewes A; Hey M
    HNO; 2024 Jul; 72(7):504-514. PubMed ID: 38536465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition of digit triplets and monosyllabic words in multitalker babble by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 16866003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):577-87. PubMed ID: 9440343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children.
    Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bronkhorst AW; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1374-83. PubMed ID: 2808911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA; Daneman M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):593-608. PubMed ID: 7860836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis.
    Duquesnoy AJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):537-44. PubMed ID: 7419810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.