138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33436922)
1. A case control study examining the feasibility of using eye tracking perimetry to differentiate patients with glaucoma from healthy controls.
Tatham AJ; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):839. PubMed ID: 33436922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of an Age-corrected Normative Database for Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP).
Tatham AJ; McClean P; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
J Glaucoma; 2020 Dec; 29(12):1106-1114. PubMed ID: 33264163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability.
Murray IC; Perperidis A; Cameron LA; McTrusty AD; Brash HM; Tatham AJ; Agarwal PK; Fleck BW; Minns RA
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):3. PubMed ID: 28900576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability.
McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Tatham AJ; Agarwal PK; Murray IC; Fleck BW; Minns RA
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Sep; 6(5):4. PubMed ID: 28900577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speed and accuracy of saccades in patients with glaucoma evaluated using an eye tracking perimeter.
Tatham AJ; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):259. PubMed ID: 32605609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual Field Plots: A Comparison Study Between Standard Automated Perimetry and Eye Movement Perimetry.
Mazumdar D; Pel JJM; Kadavath Meethal NS; Asokan R; Panday M; Steen JVD; George R
J Glaucoma; 2020 May; 29(5):351-361. PubMed ID: 32108671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): a novel technique for automated static perimetry in children using eye tracking.
Murray I; Perperidis A; Brash H; Cameron L; McTrusty A; Fleck B; Minns R
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3186-9. PubMed ID: 24110405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
Wesselink C; Jansonius NM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Sep; 37(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 28836391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between early retinal nerve fiber layer loss and visual field loss determined by three different perimetric strategies: white-on-white, frequency-doubling, or flicker-defined form perimetry.
Prokosch V; Eter N
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Oct; 252(10):1599-606. PubMed ID: 25074041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry in children with brain tumours.
Murray IC; Schmoll C; Perperidis A; Brash HM; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Wilkinson AG; Mulvihill AO; Fleck BW; Minns RA
Eye (Lond); 2018 Oct; 32(10):1563-1573. PubMed ID: 29880917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry in children with neurodisability or isolated visual pathway lesions: observational cohort study.
Tailor V; Glaze S; Unwin H; Bowman R; Thompson G; Dahlmann-Noor A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 100(10):1427-32. PubMed ID: 26740608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a pointwise linear regression analysis.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(5):2862-9. PubMed ID: 24595388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.
Tafreshi A; Sample PA; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Lalezary M; Racette L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1234-40. PubMed ID: 18978349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical applicability of the Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimeter in children with and without visual impairment.
Simkin SK; Misra SL; Kasture A; McGhee CN; Dai S
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Jan; 102(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 29938834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relative Odds of Progressing by Structural and Functional Tests in Glaucoma.
Abe RY; Diniz-Filho A; Zangwill LM; Gracitelli CP; Marvasti AH; Weinreb RN; Baig S; Medeiros FA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(9):OCT421-8. PubMed ID: 27409501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study.
Perperidis A; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Murray IC; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA; Tatham AJ
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 10(3):14. PubMed ID: 34003948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
