These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33438149)

  • 1. Listener characteristics differentially affect self-reported and physiological measures of effort associated with two challenging listening conditions.
    Francis AL; Bent T; Schumaker J; Love J; Silbert N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1818-1841. PubMed ID: 33438149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech.
    McLaughlin DJ; Baese-Berk MM; Bent T; Borrie SA; Van Engen KJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1559-1570. PubMed ID: 29740795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informational Masking and Listening Effort in Speech Recognition in Noise: The Role of Working Memory Capacity and Inhibitory Control in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment.
    Stenbäck V; Marsja E; Hällgren M; Lyxell B; Larsby B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4417-4428. PubMed ID: 36283680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of listening to nonnative-accented speech in multi-talker background noise.
    Liu Y; van Hell JG
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Oct; 203():108968. PubMed ID: 39117064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentence Context Facilitation for Children's and Adults' Recognition of Native- and Nonnative-Accented Speech.
    Bent T; Holt RF; Miller K; Libersky E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):423-433. PubMed ID: 30950691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.