These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33438523)

  • 1. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words.
    Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing.
    Haro J; López-Cortés N; Ferré P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Aug; 238():103985. PubMed ID: 37453281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment.
    Faust M; Lavidor M
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 14561447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: evidence from false memories for ambiguous words.
    Faust M; Ben-Artzi E; Harel I
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 18178246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition.
    Gao C; Shinkareva SV; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2144-2159. PubMed ID: 35113643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
    Folk JR; Morris RK
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of valence and arousal on affective priming vary with the degree of affective experience denoted by words.
    Yao Z; Wang Y; Lu B; Zhu X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jun; 140():15-25. PubMed ID: 30959075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.
    Eddington CM; Tokowicz N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 24889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical access and selection of contextually appropriate meaning for ambiguous words.
    Ihara A; Hayakawa T; Wei Q; Munetsuna S; Fujimaki N
    Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 17888689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Frost R; Feldman LB; Katz L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 2142953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
    Syssau A; Laxén J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of valence and arousal on emotional word processing are modulated by concreteness: Behavioral and ERP evidence from a lexical decision task.
    Yao Z; Yu D; Wang L; Zhu X; Guo J; Wang Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():231-242. PubMed ID: 27432482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition.
    Schvaneveldt RW; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1271030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing negative valence of word pairs that include a positive word.
    Itkes O; Mashal N
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Sep; 30(6):1180-7. PubMed ID: 26008637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.