137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33438611)
1. Improved PET quantification and harmonization by adaptive denoising.
Namías M; Jeraj R
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015023. PubMed ID: 33438611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel approach for quantitative harmonization in PET.
Namías M; Bradshaw T; Menezes VO; Machado MAD; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095019. PubMed ID: 29726406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harmonization of PET image reconstruction parameters in simultaneous PET/MRI.
Laforest R; Khalighi M; Natsuaki Y; Rajagopal A; Chandramohan D; Byrd D; An H; Larson P; James SS; Sunderland JJ; Kinahan PE; Hope TA
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Nov; 8(1):75. PubMed ID: 34739621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Harmonization based on quantitative analysis of standardized uptake value variations across PET/CT scanners: a multicenter phantom study.
Monsef A; Ay MR; Sheikhzadeh P; Geramifar P; Rahmim A; Ghafarian P
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Sep; 43(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 35836388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-local mean denoising using multiple PET reconstructions.
Arabi H; Zaidi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Feb; 35(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33244745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-scanner Aβ-PET harmonization using barrel phantom spatial resolution matching.
Ruwanpathirana GP; Williams RC; Masters CL; Rowe CC; Johnston LA; Davey CE
Alzheimers Dement (Amst); 2024; 16(1):e12561. PubMed ID: 38476638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New standards for phantom image quality and SUV harmonization range for multicenter oncology PET studies.
Akamatsu G; Shimada N; Matsumoto K; Daisaki H; Suzuki K; Watabe H; Oda K; Senda M; Terauchi T; Tateishi U
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Feb; 36(2):144-161. PubMed ID: 35029817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harmonizing SUVs in multicentre trials when using different generation PET systems: prospective validation in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Lasnon C; Desmonts C; Quak E; Gervais R; Do P; Dubos-Arvis C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Jul; 40(7):985-96. PubMed ID: 23564036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improvement of image quality in PET using post-reconstruction hybrid spatial-frequency domain filtering.
Arabi H; Zaidi H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215010. PubMed ID: 30272565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
