BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33438619)

  • 1. The dosimetric effect of variations in source position on treatments using Leipzig-style brachytherapy skin applicators.
    Murphy L
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Jan; 6(1):015031. PubMed ID: 33438619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of using multiple-dwell positions in
    Tien CJ; Pinkham DW; Chen ZJ
    Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(4):532-543. PubMed ID: 32327342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Bebig Valencia-type skin applicators: Dosimetric study and implementation of a dosimetric hybrid technique.
    Anagnostopoulos G; Andrássy M; Baltas D
    Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(5):1044-1056. PubMed ID: 28624329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric characterization of round HDR 192Ir accuboost applicators for breast brachytherapy.
    Rivard MJ; Melhus CS; Wazer DE; Bricault RJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5027-32. PubMed ID: 19994513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric characterization and output verification for conical brachytherapy surface applicators. Part II. High dose rate 192Ir sources.
    Fulkerson RK; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022104. PubMed ID: 24506636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and characterization of flattening filter for high dose rate
    Ghobadi P; Farhood B; Ghorbani M; Mohseni M
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Aug; 123():103878. PubMed ID: 32658791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric characterization and output verification for conical brachytherapy surface applicators. Part I. Electronic brachytherapy source.
    Fulkerson RK; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022103. PubMed ID: 24506635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dosimetric study of Leipzig applicators.
    Pérez-Calatayud J; Granero D; Ballester F; Puchades V; Casal E; Soriano A; Crispín V
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):579-84. PubMed ID: 15890603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of
    Safigholi H; Meigooni AS; Song WY
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4426-4436. PubMed ID: 28494095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose distribution for endovascular brachytherapy using Ir-192 sources: comparison of Monte Carlo calculations with radiochromic film measurements.
    Sureka CS; Sunny CS; Subbaiah KV; Aruna P; Ganesan S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):525-37. PubMed ID: 17202631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the effect of various intracavitary applicators on dosimetric parameters of (192)Ir, (137)Cs, and (60)Co sources.
    Ghorbani M; Hashempour M; Azizi M; Meigooni AS
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Jun; 39(2):477-91. PubMed ID: 27168066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical Note: Dosimetry of Leipzig and Valencia applicators without the plastic cap.
    Granero D; Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J; Jacob D; Mourtada F
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2087. PubMed ID: 27147321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric optimization of a conical breast brachytherapy applicator for improved skin dose sparing.
    Yang Y; Rivard MJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5665-71. PubMed ID: 21158278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric characterization of the M-15 high-dose-rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy source using the AAPM and ESTRO formalism.
    Ho Than MT; Munro Iii JJ; Medich DC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5270. PubMed ID: 26103489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo skin dose simulation in intraoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer using spherical applicators.
    Moradi F; Ung NM; Khandaker MU; Mahdiraji GA; Saad M; Abdul Malik R; Bustam AZ; Zaili Z; Bradley DA
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(16):6550-6566. PubMed ID: 28708603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of bone dose arising from skin cancer brachytherapy: A comparison between
    Sheikholeslami S; Khodaverdian S; Hashemzaei F; Ghobadi P; Ghorbani M; Farhood B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jun; 205():106089. PubMed ID: 33862569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and evaluation of a HDR skin applicator with flattening filter.
    Granero D; Pérez-Calatayud J; Gimeno J; Ballester F; Casal E; Crispín V; van der Laarse R
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):495-503. PubMed ID: 18383670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric analysis of a shielded applicator for nasopharyngeal carcinoma intracavitary brachytherapy: Monte Carlo calculation.
    Chen LX; Liu XW; You RA; Qian JY; Qi ZY; Deng XW; Tsao SY
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):761-9. PubMed ID: 16878578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and characterization of a new high-dose-rate brachytherapy Valencia applicator for larger skin lesions.
    Candela-Juan C; Niatsetski Y; van der Laarse R; Granero D; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J; Vijande J
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1639. PubMed ID: 27036563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetry of a sonolucent material for an ultrasound-compatible gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy cylinder using Monte Carlo simulation and radiochromic film.
    Van Elburg DJ; Roumeliotis M; Morrison H; Rodgers JR; Fenster A; Meyer T
    Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(1):265-271. PubMed ID: 33039331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.