These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33438663)

  • 1. Uncertainty estimation and statistical comparative methodology for mammography x-ray energy spectra.
    Santoro-Fernandes V; Santos JC; Mariano L; Vanin VR; Costa PR
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035018. PubMed ID: 33438663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte-Carlo study of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography with cadmium telluride photon-counting x-ray detectors.
    Day JA; Tanguay J
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2479-2498. PubMed ID: 37967277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glandular radiation dose in tomosynthesis of the breast using tungsten targets.
    Sechopoulosa I; D'Orsi CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 9(4):161-171. PubMed ID: 19020492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measured low-energy x-ray spectra of interest in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Hernandez-Guzman A; Moreno-Ramírez A; Massillon-Jl G
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
    Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography.
    Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct measurement of mammographic X-ray spectra with a digital CdTe detection system.
    Abbene L; Gerardi G; Principato F; Del Sordo S; Raso G
    Sensors (Basel); 2012; 12(6):8390-404. PubMed ID: 22969406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
    Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental and Monte Carlo-simulated spectra of standard mammography-quality beams.
    David MG; Pires EJ; Bernal MA; Peixoto JG; Dealmeida CE
    Br J Radiol; 2012 May; 85(1013):629-35. PubMed ID: 22010026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of mammographic x-ray spectra generated using Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System.
    Chusin T; Matsubara K; Takemura A; Okubo R; Ogawa Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(6):065004. PubMed ID: 32187021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra: simulation with EGSnrc and experiment with CdTe detector.
    Nigapruke K; Puwanich P; Phaisangittisakul N; Youngdee W
    J Radiat Res; 2009 Nov; 50(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 19696472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C.
    Ay MR; Shahriari M; Sarkar S; Adib M; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):4897-917. PubMed ID: 15584526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.