175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33438680)
1. Dose-average linear energy transfer of electrons released in liquid water and LiF:Mg,Ti by low-energy x-rays,
Massillon-Jl G; Cabrera-Santiago A
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Mar; 6(3):037001. PubMed ID: 33438680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Track-average LET of secondary electrons generated in LiF:Mg,Ti and liquid water by 20-300 kV x-ray,
Cabrera-Santiago A; Massillon-Jl G
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(22):7919-7933. PubMed ID: 27779122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose to water versus dose to medium from cavity theory applied to small animal irradiation with kilovolt x-rays.
Vaniqui A; Walters BR; Fonseca GP; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165001. PubMed ID: 31252419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy correction factors of LiF powder TLDs irradiated in high-energy electron beams and applied to mailed dosimetry for quality assurance networks.
Marre D; Ferreira IH; Bridier A; Björeland A; Svensson H; Dutreix A; Chavaudra J
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Dec; 45(12):3657-74. PubMed ID: 11131191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on
Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thermoluminescent response and relative efficiency of TLD-100 exposed to low-energy x-rays.
Gamboa-deBuen I; Buenfil AE; Ruiz CG; Rodríguez-Villafuerte M; Flores A; Brandan ME
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2073-83. PubMed ID: 9725590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence factors of common TLD materials in photon and electron beams.
Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2015-32. PubMed ID: 9725586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction factors to convert microdosimetry measurements in silicon to tissue in
Bolst D; Guatelli S; Tran LT; Chartier L; Lerch ML; Matsufuji N; Rosenfeld AB
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2055-2069. PubMed ID: 28151733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo calculation of the primary radical and molecular yields of liquid water radiolysis in the linear energy transfer range 0.3-6.5 keV/micrometer: application to 137Cs gamma rays.
Meesungnoen J; Benrahmoune M; Filali-Mouhim A; Mankhetkorn S; Jay-Gerin JP
Radiat Res; 2001 Feb; 155(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 11175661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the suitability of ultrathin detectors for absorbed dose assessment in the presence of high-density heterogeneities.
Bueno M; Carrasco P; Jornet N; Muñoz-Montplet C; Duch MA
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081710. PubMed ID: 25086520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid ionization chamber initial recombination dependence on LET for electrons and photons.
Johansson E; Andersson J; Johansson L; Tölli H
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4225-36. PubMed ID: 23719412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in the calibrated response of LiF, Al2O3, and silicon dosimeters when used for in-phantom measurements of source photons with energies between 30 KeV AND 300 KeV.
Poudel S; Currier B; Medich DC
Health Phys; 2015 Apr; 108(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 25706137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power saturation of ESR signal in ammonium tartrate exposed to 60Co gamma-ray photons, electrons and protons.
Marrale M; Brai M; Triolo A; Bartolotta A; D'Oca MC
Radiat Res; 2006 Nov; 166(5):802-9. PubMed ID: 17067208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phy-X/ZeXTRa: a software for robust calculation of effective atomic numbers for photon, electron, proton, alpha particle, and carbon ion interactions.
Özpolat ÖF; Alım B; Şakar E; Büyükyıldız M; Kurudirek M
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2020 May; 59(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 31960126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons.
Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
