These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33439578)

  • 1. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Morozov A; Barret E; Veneziano D; Grigoryan V; Salomon G; Fokin I; Taratkin M; Poddubskaya E; Gomez Rivas J; Puliatti S; Okhunov Z; Cacciamani GE; Checcucci E; Marenco Jiménez JL; Enikeev D;
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 33439578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Moris L; Gandaglia G; Vilaseca A; Van den Broeck T; Briers E; De Santis M; Gillessen S; Grivas N; O'Hanlon S; Henry A; Lam TB; Lardas M; Mason M; Oprea-Lager D; Ploussard G; Rouviere O; Schoots IG; van der Poel H; Wiegel T; Willemse PP; Yuan CY; Grummet JP; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Cornford P; Mottet N
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 May; 8(3):690-700. PubMed ID: 34147405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Bellangino M; Verrill C; Leslie T; Bell RW; Hamdy FC; Lamb AD
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Nov; 18(12):99. PubMed ID: 29116405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Zheng T; Zhang X; Ma X; Li HZ; Gao JP; Cai W; Dong J; Chen GF; Wang BJ; Shi TP; Song EL; Chen WH; Huang QB
    Asian J Androl; 2013 Jul; 15(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 23708458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy and its effect on continence and erectile function recovery: long-term results and trifecta rates of a comparative analysis.
    Hatzichristodoulou G; Wagenpfeil S; Wagenpfeil G; Maurer T; Horn T; Herkommer K; Hegemann M; Gschwend JE; Kübler H
    World J Urol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):811-20. PubMed ID: 26420596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
    Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
    Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve-sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome.
    van der Slot MA; den Bakker MA; Tan TSC; Remmers S; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; Kweldam CF; Kliffen M; Hamoen KE; Budel LM; Goemaere NNT; Helleman J; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH;
    BJU Int; 2022 Nov; 130(5):628-636. PubMed ID: 35536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Reeves F; Preece P; Kapoor J; Everaerts W; Murphy DG; Corcoran NM; Costello AJ
    Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):692-704. PubMed ID: 25454614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.
    Wang JG; Huang J; Chin AI
    Asian J Androl; 2014; 16(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 24969055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Sivaraman A; Kameh D; Palmer KJ; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):796-802. PubMed ID: 22230713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of positive surgical margins after biopsy-selected nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Graefen M; Hammerer P; Michl U; Noldus J; Haese A; Henke RP; Huland E; Huland H
    Urology; 1998 Mar; 51(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 9510349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.
    Walz J; Epstein JI; Ganzer R; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Kaouk J; Menon M; Mottrie A; Myers RP; Patel V; Tewari A; Villers A; Artibani W
    Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 26850969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.
    Dinneen EP; Van Der Slot M; Adasonla K; Tan J; Grierson J; Haider A; Freeman A; Oakley N; Shaw G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Jul; 6(4):664-673. PubMed ID: 31787570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.
    Yossepowitch O; Briganti A; Eastham JA; Epstein J; Graefen M; Montironi R; Touijer K
    Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 23932439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Hvarness H; Christensen IJ; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 24579803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.
    Chang KD; Abdel Raheem A; Choi YD; Chung BH; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 29645348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact and Predictive Value of Prostate Weight on the Outcomes of Nerve Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
    Jiang DG; Xiao CT; Mao YH; Qiu JG; Si-Tu J; Lu MH; Gao X
    Urol J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):260-266. PubMed ID: 30206921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.