These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 334399)

  • 1. Ascertainment in the sequential sampling of pedigrees.
    Cannings C; Thompson EA
    Clin Genet; 1977 Oct; 12(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 334399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting for Ascertainment.
    Ewens W; Elston RC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():211-232. PubMed ID: 28980248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. III. Pedigrees.
    Shute NC; Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Oct; 43(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 3177381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Counseling for dominant traits: a correction for the ascertainment bias due to referral for analysis.
    Gladstien K; Spence MA
    Clin Genet; 1979 Feb; 15(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 761417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling correction in pedigree analysis.
    Ginsburg E; Malkin I; Elston RC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2003; 2():Article2. PubMed ID: 16646780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of sequential and fixed-structure sampling of pedigrees in complex segregation analysis of a quantitative trait.
    Boehnke M; Young MR; Moll PP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Sep; 43(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 3414688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data.
    Boehnke M; Lange K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sampling considerations in the gathering and analysis of pedigree data.
    Elston RC; Sobel E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1979 Jan; 31(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: sequential schemes for sibships.
    Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 7272417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling correction in linkage analysis.
    Ginsburg E; Malkin I; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 27(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15305325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correcting for ascertainment.
    Ewens W; Elston RC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():187-209. PubMed ID: 22307700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sampling schemes and ascertainment.
    Thompson EA; Cannings C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():363-82. PubMed ID: 523478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait.
    Dawson DV; Elston RC
    Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic analysis of late-onset diseases using first-degree relatives.
    Sobel E; Davanipour Z; Alter M
    Neuroepidemiology; 1988; 7(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 3374730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on Cannings and Thompson's sequential sampling scheme for pedigrees.
    Hodge SE; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1986 Aug; 39(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 3752090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudo low penetrance in retinoblastoma. Fortuitous familial aggregation of sporadic cases caused by independently derived mutations in two large pedigrees.
    Munier FL; Wang MX; Spence MA; Thonney F; Balmer A; Pescia G; Donoso LA; Murphree AL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Nov; 111(11):1507-11. PubMed ID: 8240106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditional probability methods for haplotyping in pedigrees.
    Gao G; Hoeschele I; Sorensen P; Du F
    Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):2055-65. PubMed ID: 15342540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ascertainment-bias correction schemes for pedigrees ascertained through multiple probands.
    Majumder PP
    Stat Med; 1985; 4(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 4023475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability calculations in pedigrees under complex modes of inheritance.
    Lalouel JM
    Hum Hered; 1980; 30(5):320-3. PubMed ID: 7390524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.