These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33441879)

  • 21. Blinded evaluation of cathepsin S inhibitors from the D3RGC3 dataset using molecular docking and free energy calculations.
    Chaput L; Selwa E; Elisée E; Iorga BI
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 30206740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
    Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation Workflow for Drug Discovery.
    Ries B; Alibay I; Anand NM; Biggin PC; Magarkar A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jul; 64(14):5357-5364. PubMed ID: 38952038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Free Energy Calculations Using the Movable Type Method with Molecular Dynamics Driven Protein-Ligand Sampling.
    Liu W; Liu Z; Liu H; Westerhoff LM; Zheng Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5645-5665. PubMed ID: 36282990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. BFEE: A User-Friendly Graphical Interface Facilitating Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations.
    Fu H; Gumbart JC; Chen H; Shao X; Cai W; Chipot C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Mar; 58(3):556-560. PubMed ID: 29405709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binding affinities of the farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 estimated by free-energy perturbation and docking.
    Olsson MA; García-Sosa AT; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):211-224. PubMed ID: 28879536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset.
    Shirts MR; Klein C; Swails JM; Yin J; Gilson MK; Mobley DL; Case DA; Zhong ED
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 27787702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blind prediction of charged ligand binding affinities in a model binding site.
    Rocklin GJ; Boyce SE; Fischer M; Fish I; Mobley DL; Shoichet BK; Dill KA
    J Mol Biol; 2013 Nov; 425(22):4569-83. PubMed ID: 23896298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Absolute Binding Free Energies with OneOPES.
    Karrenbrock M; Borsatto A; Rizzi V; Lukauskis D; Aureli S; Luigi Gervasio F
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2024 Oct; 15(39):9871-9880. PubMed ID: 39302888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of ligand binding mode among multiple cross-docking poses by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu K; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Nov; 34(11):1195-1205. PubMed ID: 32869148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An efficient computational method for calculating ligand binding affinities.
    Suenaga A; Okimoto N; Hirano Y; Fukui K
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42846. PubMed ID: 22916168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GroScore: Accurate Scoring of Protein-Protein Binding Poses Using Explicit-Solvent Free-Energy Calculations.
    Perthold JW; Oostenbrink C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Dec; 59(12):5074-5085. PubMed ID: 31790223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combining Alchemical Transformation with a Physical Pathway to Accelerate Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations of Charged Ligands to Enclosed Binding Sites.
    Cruz J; Wickstrom L; Yang D; Gallicchio E; Deng N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Apr; 16(4):2803-2813. PubMed ID: 32101691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Predicted Protein-Protein Complexes by Binding Free Energy Simulations.
    Siebenmorgen T; Zacharias M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2071-2086. PubMed ID: 30698954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. LiGRO: a graphical user interface for protein-ligand molecular dynamics.
    Kagami LP; das Neves GM; da Silva AWS; Caceres RA; Kawano DF; Eifler-Lima VL
    J Mol Model; 2017 Oct; 23(11):304. PubMed ID: 28980073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MDFit: automated molecular simulations workflow enables high throughput assessment of ligands-protein dynamics.
    Brueckner AC; Shields B; Kirubakaran P; Suponya A; Panda M; Posy SL; Johnson S; Lakkaraju SK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2024 Jul; 38(1):24. PubMed ID: 39014286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of protein-protein docking model structures using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations combined with the solution theory in the energy representation.
    Takemura K; Guo H; Sakuraba S; Matubayasi N; Kitao A
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(21):215105. PubMed ID: 23231264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distinguishing binders from false positives by free energy calculations: fragment screening against the flap site of HIV protease.
    Deng N; Forli S; He P; Perryman A; Wickstrom L; Vijayan RS; Tiefenbrunn T; Stout D; Gallicchio E; Olson AJ; Levy RM
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):976-88. PubMed ID: 25189630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.