These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33441930)

  • 1. Strategically positioning cooperators can facilitate the contagion of cooperation.
    Yang G; Cavaliere M; Zhu C; Perc M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1127. PubMed ID: 33441930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ranking the invasions of cheaters in structured populations.
    Yang G; Cavaliere M; Zhu C; Perc M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2231. PubMed ID: 32042010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptation to a new environment allows cooperators to purge cheaters stochastically.
    Waite AJ; Shou W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Nov; 109(47):19079-86. PubMed ID: 23091010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information Cascades and the Collapse of Cooperation.
    Yang G; Csikász-Nagy A; Waites W; Xiao G; Cavaliere M
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8004. PubMed ID: 32409658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased privatization of a public resource leads to spread of cooperation in a microbial population.
    Raj N; Saini S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):e0235823. PubMed ID: 38206031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generous cooperators can outperform non-generous cooperators when replacing a population of defectors.
    Kurokawa S; Wakano JY; Ihara Y
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Jun; 77(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 20226204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allopatric divergence of cooperators confers cheating resistance and limits effects of a defector mutation.
    Schaal KA; Yu YN; Vasse M; Velicer GJ
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):141. PubMed ID: 36510120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stable polymorphism of cooperators and punishers in a public goods game.
    Oya G; Ohtsuki H
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():243-253. PubMed ID: 27880875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial self-organization favors heterotypic cooperation over cheating.
    Momeni B; Waite AJ; Shou W
    Elife; 2013 Nov; 2():e00960. PubMed ID: 24220506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defectors Can Create Conditions That Rescue Cooperation.
    Waite AJ; Cannistra C; Shou W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004645. PubMed ID: 26690946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Green-beard effect predicts the evolution of traitorousness in the two-tag Prisoner's dilemma.
    Laird RA
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Nov; 288():84-91. PubMed ID: 21821051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditional strategies and the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games.
    Szolnoki A; Perc M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Feb; 85(2 Pt 2):026104. PubMed ID: 22463276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of a strategy for cooperating cells to survive the presence of cheaters.
    Prajapat MK; Shroff I; Brajesh RG; Saini S
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Oct; 12(11):3338-3346. PubMed ID: 27754502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The public goods game with shared punishment cost in well-mixed and structured populations.
    Wang X; Lv S
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Sep; 476():36-43. PubMed ID: 31150664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for strategic cooperation in humans.
    Burton-Chellew MN; El Mouden C; West SA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jun; 284(1856):. PubMed ID: 28592673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation.
    Rand DG; Nowak MA; Fowler JH; Christakis NA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(48):17093-8. PubMed ID: 25404308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategic investment explains patterns of cooperation and cheating in a microbe.
    Madgwick PG; Stewart B; Belcher LJ; Thompson CRL; Wolf JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):E4823-E4832. PubMed ID: 29735672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-local interaction via diffusible resource prevents coexistence of cooperators and cheaters in a lattice model.
    Borenstein DB; Meir Y; Shaevitz JW; Wingreen NS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63304. PubMed ID: 23691017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invasion of cooperators in lattice populations: linear and non-linear public good games.
    Vásárhelyi Z; Scheuring I
    Biosystems; 2013 Aug; 113(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 23727301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optogenetic spatial patterning of cooperation in yeast populations.
    Le Bec M; Pouzet S; Cordier C; Barral S; Scolari V; Sorre B; Banderas A; Hersen P
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):75. PubMed ID: 38168087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.