These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33442826)

  • 1. Reward makes the rhythmic sampling of spatial attention emerge earlier.
    Su Z; Wang L; Kang G; Zhou X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1522-1537. PubMed ID: 33442826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualitative differences in response bias from spatial cueing.
    Müller HJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Jun; 48(2):218-41. PubMed ID: 8069283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reward Weakened Inhibition of Return (IOR) in the Near Depth Plane.
    Wang A; Lu F; Gao W; Zhang T; Zhang M
    Perception; 2022 Feb; 51(2):114-130. PubMed ID: 35098807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral oscillations in attention: rhythmic α pulses mediated through θ band.
    Song K; Meng M; Chen L; Zhou K; Luo H
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(14):4837-44. PubMed ID: 24695703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of return effect in exogenous orienting.
    Yang D; Yao S; Ding C; Qi S; Lei Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Sep; 221(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 22791229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.
    Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Independent effects of reward expectation and spatial orientation on the processing of emotional facial expressions.
    Kang G; Zhou X; Wei P
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2571-80. PubMed ID: 26026807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence of rhythmic visuospatial attention at cued locations in a spatial cuing paradigm, regardless of their behavioural relevance.
    van der Werf OJ; Ten Oever S; Schuhmann T; Sack AT
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 55(11-12):3100-3116. PubMed ID: 34131983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
    Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.
    Lim A; Eng V; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1369-1382. PubMed ID: 29520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No evidence for rhythmic sampling in inhibition of return.
    Michel R; Busch NA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):2111-2121. PubMed ID: 37610529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Appetitive and aversive outcome associations modulate exogenous cueing.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2253-65. PubMed ID: 27146992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence.
    Li X; Zhang M; Wu L; Zhang Q; Wei P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():608427. PubMed ID: 34045946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rewards weaken cross-modal inhibition of return with visual targets.
    Qian Q; Lu M; Sun D; Wang A; Zhang M
    Perception; 2023 Jun; 52(6):400-411. PubMed ID: 37186788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.