These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33442826)

  • 21. Rhythmic sampling within and between objects despite sustained attention at a cued location.
    Fiebelkorn IC; Saalmann YB; Kastner S
    Curr Biol; 2013 Dec; 23(24):2553-8. PubMed ID: 24316204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Irrelevant learned reward associations disrupt voluntary spatial attention.
    MacLean MH; Diaz GK; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2241-52. PubMed ID: 27084702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of reward on orienting and reorienting in exogenous cuing.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 14(2):635-46. PubMed ID: 24671762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.
    Mayo JP; Maunsell JH
    J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(19):5353-61. PubMed ID: 27170131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The causal role of the left parietal lobe in facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Lupiáñez J; Narganes-Pineda C; Marino G; Colás I; Chica AB
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():311-322. PubMed ID: 31185374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visually Induced Inhibition of Return Affects the Integration of Auditory and Visual Information.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TCW; Spence C
    Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 27484341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.
    Crawford TJ; Muller HJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural processes of attentional inhibition of return traced with magnetoencephalography.
    Ayabe T; Ishizu T; Kojima S; Urakawa T; Nishitani N; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R
    Neuroscience; 2008 Oct; 156(3):769-80. PubMed ID: 18762232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Was that a threat? Attentional biases by signals of threat.
    Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2017 Apr; 17(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 27819442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceptual merging contributes to cueing effects.
    Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ; Hunt AR
    J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inhibition of return in time-lapse: Brain Rhythms during grip force control for spatial attention.
    Zappasodi F; Croce P; Di Matteo R; Brunetti M
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Dec; 163():108068. PubMed ID: 34687747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Temporal expectancies and rhythmic cueing in touch: The influence of spatial attention.
    Jones A
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():140-150. PubMed ID: 30248473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.
    Amenedo E; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Darriba Á; Pazo-Álvarez P
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():616-28. PubMed ID: 26456119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing.
    Rieth CA; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80. PubMed ID: 23181686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatiotemporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive orienting of covert attention.
    Collie A; Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Currie J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Dec; 26(6):1733-45. PubMed ID: 11129370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.
    Yoxon E; Constable MD; Welsh TN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2410-2423. PubMed ID: 31338823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interaction between spatial inhibition of return (IOR) and executive control in three-dimensional space.
    Wang A; Yue Z; Zhang M; Chen Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3059-71. PubMed ID: 26169107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.