These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33442826)

  • 41. No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.
    MacInnes WJ; Bhatnagar R
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13289. PubMed ID: 30185930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sustained Visual Priming Effects Can Emerge from Attentional Oscillation and Temporal Expectation.
    Wang M; Huang Y; Luo H; Zhang H
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(18):3657-3674. PubMed ID: 32253359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. RT Slowing to Valid Cues on a Reflexive Attention Task in Children and Young Adults.
    Lundwall RA; Woodruff J; Tolboe SP
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1324. PubMed ID: 30127758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Facilitation and inhibition mechanisms of human visuospatial attention in a non-search task.
    Facoetti A
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Jan; 298(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11154832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Inhibition of return and attentional facilitation: Numbers can be counted in, letters tell a different story.
    Hoffmann D; Goffaux V; Schuller AM; Schiltz C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():74-80. PubMed ID: 26613388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Neurophysiological Activations of Predictive and Non-predictive Exogenous Cues: A Cue-Elicited EEG Study on the Generation of Inhibition of Return.
    Vivas AB; Paraskevopoulos E; Castillo A; Fuentes LJ
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():227. PubMed ID: 30800091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.
    Lupiáñez J; Milliken B; Solano C; Weaver B; Tipper SP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):753-73. PubMed ID: 11548033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition-of-return.
    Röder B; Spence C; Rösler F
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 11914791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Selection for encoding: No evidence of better endogenous orienting following forget than following remember instructions.
    Rubinfeld LM; Taylor TL; Hamm JP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):237-252. PubMed ID: 30194621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dissociating inhibition of return from endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks.
    Chica AB; Lupianez J; Bartolomeo P
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 23(7):1015-34. PubMed ID: 21049365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.
    Pratt J; Hirshhorn M
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.
    Mulckhuyse M; Crombez G
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1223-41. PubMed ID: 24467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough.
    Kasten R; Navon D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Inhibition of return in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Li CS; Chang HL; Lin SC
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Mar; 149(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 12592510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.