These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33443151)
1. Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments. Narita Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(1):. PubMed ID: 33443151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social aspects of sham surgeries. Leeds HS Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):70-1. PubMed ID: 14744343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical considerations of randomized control trials with human participants in dentistry. A reflective analysis. Chen E J Am Coll Dent; 2013; 80(3):21-8. PubMed ID: 24283033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Children, research, and guinea pigs: reflections on a metaphor. Gordon EJ; Yamokoski AH; Kodish E IRB; 2006; 28(5):12-9. PubMed ID: 17152130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the causal effect of randomization versus treatment preference in a doubly randomized preference trial. Marcus SM; Stuart EA; Wang P; Shadish WR; Steiner PM Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 22563844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A third way: ethics guidance as evidence-informed provisional rules. Borgerson K; Millum J Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):20-2. PubMed ID: 20526963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An absence of evidence in "evidence-based rulemaking". Gerson J; Goodman SN Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 20526964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Are human research subjects safe enough? Thompson RE Physician Exec; 2003; 29(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 14650072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflections of an ethicist: research ethics committees and the investigator--a healthy partnership? Farnell SM Med Pediatr Oncol; 2003 Jul; 41(1):67-8. PubMed ID: 12764748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When "minimal risk" research yields clinically-significant data, maybe the risks aren't so minimal. Sharp HM; Orr RD Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(2):W32-6. PubMed ID: 15186687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the ethics of ethics research: a case study. Miller FG; Wendler D IRB; 2004; 26(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 15069971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Some reflections on evaluating institutional review board effectiveness. Resnik DB Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt B):261-264. PubMed ID: 26408053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sham surgery in randomized trials: additional requirements should be satisfied. Mann H Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W5-W7. PubMed ID: 14744304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Data monitoring committees and stopping trials-Giving participants a voice. Trachtman H; Caplan A Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 May; 68():146. PubMed ID: 29567282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tipping point, over the top, or just noncompliance as usual? Koski G Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):27-9. PubMed ID: 18457226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]