260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33444020)
1. Systematic Differences between Current Molecular Dynamics Force Fields To Represent Local Properties of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Yu L; Li DW; Brüschweiler R
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(3):798-804. PubMed ID: 33444020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison and Evaluation of Force Fields for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Rahman MU; Rehman AU; Liu H; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4912-4923. PubMed ID: 32816485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. General Purpose Water Model Can Improve Atomistic Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Shabane PS; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2620-2634. PubMed ID: 30865832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting molecular properties of α-synuclein using force fields for intrinsically disordered proteins.
Pedersen KB; Flores-Canales JC; Schiøtt B
Proteins; 2023 Jan; 91(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 35950933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Balanced Amino-Acid-Specific Molecular Dynamics Force Field for the Realistic Simulation of Both Folded and Disordered Proteins.
Yu L; Li DW; Brüschweiler R
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Feb; 16(2):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 31877033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The IDP-Specific Force Field ff14IDPSFF Improves the Conformer Sampling of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Song D; Luo R; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 May; 57(5):1166-1178. PubMed ID: 28448138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New force field on modeling intrinsically disordered proteins.
Wang W; Ye W; Jiang C; Luo R; Chen HF
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Sep; 84(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 24589355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrinsically disordered protein-specific force field CHARMM36IDPSFF.
Liu H; Song D; Lu H; Luo R; Chen HF
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2018 Oct; 92(4):1722-1735. PubMed ID: 29808548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent advances in atomic molecular dynamics simulation of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Wang W
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jan; 23(2):777-784. PubMed ID: 33355572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do molecular dynamics force fields accurately model Ramachandran distributions of amino acid residues in water?
Andrews B; Guerra J; Schweitzer-Stenner R; Urbanc B
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Feb; 24(5):3259-3279. PubMed ID: 35048087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How accurate are your simulations? Effects of confined aqueous volume and AMBER FF99SB and CHARMM22/CMAP force field parameters on structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins: Amyloid-β
Weber OC; Uversky VN
Intrinsically Disord Proteins; 2017; 5(1):e1377813. PubMed ID: 30250773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Force Field Evaluation and Comparison with Experiment.
Henriques J; Cragnell C; Skepö M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jul; 11(7):3420-31. PubMed ID: 26575776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ff14IDPs force field improving the conformation sampling of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Song D; Wang W; Ye W; Ji D; Luo R; Chen HF
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2017 Jan; 89(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 27484738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved validation of IDP ensembles by one-bond Cα-Hα scalar couplings.
Gapsys V; Narayanan RL; Xiang S; de Groot BL; Zweckstetter M
J Biomol NMR; 2015 Nov; 63(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 26433382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Mu J; Liu H; Zhang J; Luo R; Chen HF
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Mar; 61(3):1037-1047. PubMed ID: 33591749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of peptides and intrinsically disordered proteins to their folded targets. 1. NMR and MD characterization of the complex between the c-Crk N-SH3 domain and the peptide Sos.
Xue Y; Yuwen T; Zhu F; Skrynnikov NR
Biochemistry; 2014 Oct; 53(41):6473-95. PubMed ID: 25207671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
