These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33444104)
1. Immersive 3D Experience of Osmosis Improves Learning Outcomes of First-Year Cell Biology Students. Reinke NB; Kynn M; Parkinson AL CBE Life Sci Educ; 2021 Mar; 20(1):ar1. PubMed ID: 33444104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applying an immersive tutorial in virtual reality to learning a new technique. Ros M; Debien B; Cyteval C; Molinari N; Gatto F; Lonjon N Neurochirurgie; 2020 Aug; 66(4):212-218. PubMed ID: 32623059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of three-dimensional visualisation on undergraduate nursing and midwifery students' knowledge and achievement in pharmacology: A mixed methods study. Hanson J; Andersen P; Dunn PK Nurse Educ Today; 2019 Oct; 81():19-25. PubMed ID: 31306850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How effective are simulated molecular-level experiments for teaching diffusion and osmosis? Meir E; Perry J; Stal D; Maruca S; Klopfer E Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16220144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study. Craft JA; Christensen M; Shaw N; Bakon S Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Dec; 59():6-11. PubMed ID: 28898728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing student codesigned immersive virtual reality simulations for teaching of challenging concepts in molecular and cellular biology. Reen FJ; Jump O; McEvoy G; McSharry BP; Morgan J; Murphy D; O'Leary N; O'Mahony B; Scallan M; Walsh C; Supple B FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2022 Jul; 369(1):. PubMed ID: 35671125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Engaging Oral Health Students in Learning Basic Science Through Assessment That Weaves in Personal Experience. Leadbeatter D; Gao J J Dent Educ; 2018 Apr; 82(4):388-398. PubMed ID: 29606656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Web-Based Immersive Virtual Patient Simulators: Positive Effect on Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education. Kleinert R; Heiermann N; Plum PS; Wahba R; Chang DH; Maus M; Chon SH; Hoelscher AH; Stippel DL J Med Internet Res; 2015 Nov; 17(11):e263. PubMed ID: 26577020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacy students' perceptions of assessment and its impact on learning. Malau-Aduli BS; Preston R; Adu M; Alele F; Gratani M; Drovandi A; Heslop I Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Jun; 11(6):571-579. PubMed ID: 31213312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D immersive patient simulators and their impact on learning success: a thematic review. Kleinert R; Wahba R; Chang DH; Plum P; Hölscher AH; Stippel DL J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e91. PubMed ID: 25858862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input. Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing Student Learning in Removable Partial Denture Design by Using Virtual Three-Dimensional Models Versus Traditional Two-Dimensional Drawings: A Comparative Study. Mahrous A; Schneider GB; Holloway JA; Dawson DV J Prosthodont; 2019 Oct; 28(8):927-933. PubMed ID: 31343801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open problem-based instruction impacts understanding of physiological concepts differently in undergraduate students. Franklin BM; Xiang L; Collett JA; Rhoads MK; Osborn JL Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Dec; 39(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 26628656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osmosis and diffusion conceptual assessment. Fisher KM; Williams KS; Lineback JE CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(4):418-29. PubMed ID: 22135375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving large class performance and engagement through student-generated question banks. Hancock D; Hare N; Denny P; Denyer G Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2018 Jul; 46(4):306-317. PubMed ID: 29528559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative case study of 2D, 3D and immersive-virtual-reality applications for healthcare education. López Chávez O; Rodríguez LF; Gutierrez-Garcia JO Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104226. PubMed ID: 32659739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Video delivery of toxicology educational content versus textbook for asynchronous learning, using acetaminophen overdose as a topic. Vo T; Ledbetter C; Zuckerman M Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2019 Oct; 57(10):842-846. PubMed ID: 30806092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]