These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33445125)

  • 21. Image Quality Evaluation in Dual-Energy CT of the Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Obese Patients With Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.
    Fair E; Profio M; Kulkarni N; Laviolette PS; Barnes B; Bobholz S; Levenhagen M; Ausman R; Griffin MO; Duvnjak P; Zorn AP; Foley WD
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):604-611. PubMed ID: 35483100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protocol Optimization Considerations for Implementing Deep Learning CT Reconstruction.
    Szczykutowicz TP; Nett B; Cherkezyan L; Pozniak M; Tang J; Lubner MG; Hsieh J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1668-1677. PubMed ID: 33852337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of two deep learning-based reconstruction methods compared with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction method for solid and ground-glass nodule volumetry on low-dose and ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography: A phantom study.
    Kim C; Kwack T; Kim W; Cha J; Yang Z; Yong HS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270122. PubMed ID: 35737734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative assessment of noise properties for two deep learning CT image reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection.
    Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Takata T; Seto I
    Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6359-6367. PubMed ID: 36047991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm to improve image quality in CT angiography of children with Takayasu arteritis.
    Sun J; Li H; Li H; Li M; Gao Y; Zhou Z; Peng Y
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(1):177-184. PubMed ID: 34806646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality assessment of pediatric chest and abdomen CT by deep learning reconstruction.
    Yoon H; Kim J; Lim HJ; Lee MJ
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Oct; 21(1):146. PubMed ID: 34629049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance evaluation of iterative reconstruction algorithms for achieving CT radiation dose reduction - a phantom study.
    Dodge CT; Tamm EP; Cody DD; Liu X; Jensen CT; Wei W; Kundra V; Rong XJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):511-531. PubMed ID: 27074454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computed tomography imaging with the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) algorithm: dependence of image quality on the blending level of reconstruction.
    Barca P; Giannelli M; Fantacci ME; Caramella D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):463-473. PubMed ID: 29737491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan.
    Wang H; Li LL; Shang J; Song J; Liu B
    Br J Radiol; 2022 May; 95(1133):20210380. PubMed ID: 35084210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
    Samei E; Richard S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of noise reduction on radiation dose reduction potential of virtual monochromatic spectral images: Comparison of phantom images with conventional 120 kVp images using deep learning image reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Masuda S; Yamada Y; Minamishima K; Owaki Y; Yamazaki A; Jinzaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 149():110198. PubMed ID: 35168172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Noise Reduction Effect of Deep-learning-based Image Reconstruction Algorithms in Thin-section Chest CT].
    Zeng W; Zeng LM; Xu X; Hu SX; Liu KL; Zhang JG; Peng WL; Xia CC; Li ZL
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Mar; 52(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 33829704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pulmonary emphysema quantification at low dose chest CT using Deep Learning image reconstruction.
    Ferri F; Bouzerar R; Auquier M; Vial J; Renard C
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110338. PubMed ID: 35533559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V With Combination of 80 kV for Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography for Slim Patients.
    Ren Z; Zhang X; Hu Z; Li D; Liu Z; Wei D; Jia Y; Yu N; Yu Y; Lei Y; Chen X; Guo C; Ren Z; He T
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):e324-e332. PubMed ID: 30655053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The image quality of deep-learning image reconstruction of chest CT images on a mediastinal window setting.
    Hata A; Yanagawa M; Yoshida Y; Miyata T; Kikuchi N; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Clin Radiol; 2021 Feb; 76(2):155.e15-155.e23. PubMed ID: 33220941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
    Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose
    Barca P; Domenichelli S; Golfieri R; Pierotti L; Spagnoli L; Tomasi S; Strigari L
    Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102517. PubMed ID: 36669326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.