These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33445421)

  • 41. Relating Organic Fouling in Membrane Distillation to Intermolecular Adhesion Forces and Interfacial Surface Energies.
    Boo C; Hong S; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(24):14198-14207. PubMed ID: 30481005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Roles of membrane-foulant and inter/intrafoulant species interaction forces in combined fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane.
    Ma B; Wu G; Li W; Miao R; Li X; Wang P
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():19-26. PubMed ID: 30352343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Alginate block fractions and their effects on membrane fouling.
    Meng S; Liu Y
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(17):6618-27. PubMed ID: 24070866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Biofilm increases permeate quality by organic carbon degradation in low pressure ultrafiltration.
    Chomiak A; Traber J; Morgenroth E; Derlon N
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 85():512-20. PubMed ID: 26386342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Potential Pitfalls in Membrane Fouling Evaluation: Merits of Data Representation as Resistance Instead of Flux Decline in Membrane Filtration.
    Blankert B; Van der Bruggen B; Childress AE; Ghaffour N; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34206467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of physical and chemical aspects on membrane fouling and cleaning using interfacial free energy analysis in forward osmosis.
    Zhang W; Dong B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):21555-21567. PubMed ID: 29781060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Membrane Fouling Due to Protein-Polysaccharide Mixtures in Dead-End Ultrafiltration; the Effect of Permeation Flux on Fouling Resistance.
    Sioutopoulos D; Karabelas A; Mappas V
    Membranes (Basel); 2019 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 30717080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modeling the antifouling properties of atomic layer deposition surface-modified ceramic nanofiltration membranes.
    Moyo W; Chaukura N; Motsa MM; Msagati TAM; Mamba BB; Heijman SGJ; Nkambule TTI
    Biofouling; 2022 May; 38(5):441-454. PubMed ID: 35686367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of water chemistry and operational conditions on μGAF process performance.
    Liu J; Benjamin MM
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():76-84. PubMed ID: 27598697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Combined organic-inorganic fouling of forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes.
    Arkhangelsky E; Wicaksana F; Tang C; Al-Rabiah AA; Al-Zahrani SM; Wang R
    Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(19):6329-38. PubMed ID: 23026125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influences of Combined Organic Fouling and Inorganic Scaling on Flux and Fouling Behaviors in Forward Osmosis.
    Chun Y; Jeong K; Cho KH
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32498395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline.
    Jarusutthirak C; Amy G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Feb; 40(3):969-74. PubMed ID: 16509344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quantifying the dynamic evolution of organic, inorganic and biological synergistic fouling during nanofiltration using statistical approaches.
    Lin W; Li M; Wang Y; Wang X; Xue K; Xiao K; Huang X
    Environ Int; 2019 Dec; 133(Pt B):105201. PubMed ID: 31675566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Intrinsic p
    Rho H; Cho J; Westerhoff P; Chon K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 54(12):7706-7714. PubMed ID: 32436702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of the effects of extracellular and intracellular organic matter extracted from Microcystis aeruginosa on ultrafiltration membrane fouling: dynamics and mechanisms.
    Li L; Wang Z; Rietveld LC; Gao N; Hu J; Yin D; Yu S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14549-57. PubMed ID: 25402823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Simple Method to Identify the Dominant Fouling Mechanisms during Membrane Filtration Based on Piecewise Multiple Linear Regression.
    Xu H; Xiao K; Yu J; Huang B; Wang X; Liang S; Wei C; Wen X; Huang X
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 32751292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Surface charge regulation of reverse osmosis membrane for anti-silica and organic fouling.
    Wang S; Mu C; Xiao K; Zhu X; Huang X
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 715():137013. PubMed ID: 32041057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Membrane fouling by the aggregations formed from oppositely charged organic foulants.
    Shao S; Fu W; Li X; Shi D; Jiang Y; Li J; Gong T; Li X
    Water Res; 2019 Aug; 159():95-101. PubMed ID: 31078756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.