These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33446617)

  • 1. Relationship between vertical components of maxillary molar and craniofacial frame in normal occlusion: cephalometric calibration on the vertical axis of coordinates.
    Han AR; Kim J; Yang IH
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Jan; 51(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 33446617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between Dentoalveolar Heights and Vertical Skeletal Patterns in Class I Malocclusion in Ethnic Javanese.
    Ardani IGAW; Pratiknjo IS; Djaharu'ddin I
    Eur J Dent; 2021 May; 15(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 33032332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of mandibular movement and its center of rotation for nonsurgical correction of anterior open bite via maxillary molar intrusion.
    Kim K; Choy K; Park YC; Han SY; Jung H; Choi YJ
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):538-544. PubMed ID: 29683335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Maxillary Posterior Space Discrepancy on the Molars and Overbite in Class II Malocclusions with Different Vertical Patterns.
    Golfeshan F; Khandadash S; Salehi P; Afsa M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):438-444. PubMed ID: 32584283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of vertical changes during maxillary expansion using quad helix or bonded rapid maxillary expander.
    Conroy-Piskai C; Galang-Boquiren MT; Obrez A; Viana MG; Oppermann N; Sanchez F; Edgren B; Kusnoto B
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Nov; 86(6):925-933. PubMed ID: 27182780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):41-9. PubMed ID: 27653263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of adult anterior open bite non-extraction treatment with Invisalign.
    Moshiri S; Araújo EA; McCray JF; Thiesen G; Kim KB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(5):30-38. PubMed ID: 29160342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in longitudinal craniofacial growth in subjects with normal occlusions using the Ricketts analysis.
    Bae EJ; Kwon HJ; Kwon OW
    Korean J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 44(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 24696824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with treacher Collins syndrome.
    Kapadia H; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1141-5. PubMed ID: 23851757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial changes of the chin in the vertical and sagittal planes after superior repositioning of the maxilla.
    Arabion H; Tabrizi R; Fattahi H; Khaghaninezhad M; Bahramnia F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):e249-53. PubMed ID: 25887203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of anterior open bite correction in patients treated with maxillary posterior segment intrusion using zygomatic anchorage.
    Akan B; Ünal BK; Şahan AO; Kızıltekin R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):547-554. PubMed ID: 32828611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between hypo- and hyper-divergent patterns using Falconer's method and principal component analysis.
    Kim DK; Sung J; Song YM; Kim EM; Kim YH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30516415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of maxillary position. Implant vs cephalometric methods.
    Verayannont P; Hägg U; Wong RW; McGrath C; Yeung S
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):876-83. PubMed ID: 20578858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association Between Maxillary Posterior Segment Discrepancy And The Angulation Of Maxillary Molars In Patients With Different Vertical Growth Patterns.
    Malik DES; Fida M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2019; 31(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 31933298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cephalometric comparisons of the craniofacial characteristics of Class II 1 malocclusions with different vertical types in adolescences].
    Ye Q; Zhao ZH; Zhao MY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 16955160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Kwak HJ; Park HJ; Kim YJ; Lee DY
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 29131663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in bimaxillary osteotomies: single-piece versus 3-piece maxilla.
    Kretschmer WB; Baciut G; Baciut M; Zoder W; Wangerin K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 20116710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.