These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33447860)
1. Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Laimer G; Jaschke N; Schullian P; Putzer D; Eberle G; Solbiati M; Solbiati L; Goldberg SN; Bale R Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6489-6499. PubMed ID: 33447860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation. Laimer G; Schullian P; Jaschke N; Putzer D; Eberle G; Alzaga A; Odisio B; Bale R Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 32002642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression. Kaye EA; Cornelis FH; Petre EN; Tyagi N; Shady W; Shi W; Zhang Z; Solomon SB; Sofocleous CT; Durack JC Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2698-2705. PubMed ID: 30402706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study. Sibinga Mulder BG; Hendriks P; Baetens TR; van Erkel AR; van Rijswijk CSP; van der Meer RW; van de Velde CJH; Vahrmeijer AL; Mieog JSD; Burgmans MC BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Aug; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 31429708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter and inter-software evaluation of ablative margins after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Laimer G; Verdonschot KHM; Kopf L; van der Lei S; Scharll Y; Hannink G; Jenniskens SFM; Meijerink MR; Bale R; Overduin CG Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39093415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers. Bo XW; Xu HX; Guo LH; Sun LP; Li XL; Zhao CK; He YP; Liu BJ; Li DD; Zhang K; Wang D Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170063. PubMed ID: 28749166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Vasiniotis Kamarinos N; Gonen M; Sotirchos V; Kaye E; Petre EN; Solomon SB; Erinjeri JP; Ziv E; Kirov A; Sofocleous CT Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):880-887. PubMed ID: 35848428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Assessment of Ablative Margin Using Pre-RFA MRI and Post-RFA CT Registration. Yoon JH; Lee JM; Klotz E; Woo H; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Han JK Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 30386137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can accurate evaluation of the treatment success after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors be achieved by visual inspection alone? Results of a blinded assessment with 38 interventional oncologists. Laimer G; Schullian P; Putzer D; Eberle G; Goldberg SN; Bale R Int J Hyperthermia; 2020 Nov; 37(1):1362-1367. PubMed ID: 33302747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: evaluation of ablative margin and three-dimensional volumetric analysis. Frich L; Hagen G; Brabrand K; Edwin B; Mathisen O; Aaløkken TM; Gladhaug IP J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Sep; 18(9):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17804776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ablative margin quantification using deformable versus rigid image registration in colorectal liver metastasis thermal ablation: a retrospective single-center study. Lin YM; Paolucci I; Albuquerque Marques Silva J; O'Connor CS; Hong J; Shah KY; Abdelsalam ME; Habibollahi P; Jones KA; Brock KK; Odisio BC Eur Radiol; 2024 Sep; 34(9):5541-5550. PubMed ID: 38334762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT-monitored minimal ablative margin control in single-session microwave ablation of liver tumors: an effective strategy for local tumor control. Joo I; Morrow KW; Raman SS; McWilliams JP; Sayre JW; Lu DS Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6327-6335. PubMed ID: 35389047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of A0 minimum ablative margins for colorectal liver metastases: multicentre, retrospective study using deformable CT registration and artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation. Paolucci I; Albuquerque Marques Silva J; Lin YM; Laimer G; Cignini V; Menchini F; Meira M; Shieh A; O'Connor C; Jones KA; Gazzera C; Fonio P; Brock KK; Calandri M; Menezes M; Bale R; Odisio BC Br J Surg; 2024 Aug; 111(9):. PubMed ID: 39213397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images. Takeyama N; Mizobuchi N; Sakaki M; Shimozuma Y; Munechika J; Kajiwara A; Uchikoshi M; Uozumi S; Ohgiya Y; Gokan T Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):923-935. PubMed ID: 30327828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases. Wang X; Sofocleous CT; Erinjeri JP; Petre EN; Gonen M; Do KG; Brown KT; Covey AM; Brody LA; Alago W; Thornton RH; Kemeny NE; Solomon SB Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Feb; 36(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 22535243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraprocedural Versus Initial Follow-up Minimal Ablative Margin Assessment After Colorectal Liver Metastasis Thermal Ablation: Which One Better Predicts Local Outcomes? Lin YM; Paolucci I; Albuquerque Marques Silva J; O'Connor CS; Fellman BM; Jones AK; Kuban JD; Huang SY; Metwalli ZA; Brock KK; Odisio BC Invest Radiol; 2024 Apr; 59(4):314-319. PubMed ID: 37812469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Independent validation of CT radiomics models in colorectal liver metastases: predicting local tumour progression after ablation. van der Reijd DJ; Guerendel C; Staal FCR; Busard MP; De Oliveira Taveira M; Klompenhouwer EG; Kuhlmann KFD; Moelker A; Verhoef C; Starmans MPA; Lambregts DMJ; Beets-Tan RGH; Benson S; Maas M Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3635-3643. PubMed ID: 37987835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT versus MR guidance for radiofrequency ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a 10-year follow-up favors MR guidance. Pereira PL; Siemou P; Rempp HJ; Hoffmann R; Hoffmann RT; Kettenbach J; Clasen S; Helmberger T Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4663-4671. PubMed ID: 38041717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]