238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33447993)
1. Outcome dependent growth curves for singleton pregnancies based on birth weight of babies for Polish population.
Dera-Szymanowska A; Horst N; Sobkowski M; Szymanowski K
Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(12):740-747. PubMed ID: 33447993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
Stephens K; Al-Memar M; Beattie-Jones S; Dhanjal M; Mappouridou S; Thorne E; Lees C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 31090917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome dependent twin growth curves based on birth weight percentiles for Polish population.
Horst N; Dera-Szymanowska A; Breborowicz GH; Szymanowski K
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jul; 35(13):2530-2535. PubMed ID: 32633159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
Zhang-Rutledge K; Mack LM; Mastrobattista JM; Gandhi M
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Body weight, length and head circumference at birth in a cohort of Turkish newborns.
Kurtoğlu S; Hatipoğlu N; Mazıcıoğlu MM; Akın MA; Çoban D; Gökoğlu S; Baştuğ O
J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol; 2012 Sep; 4(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 22664362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.
Grantz KL; Grewal J; Albert PS; Wapner R; D'Alton ME; Sciscione A; Grobman WA; Wing DA; Owen J; Newman RB; Chien EK; Gore-Langton RE; Kim S; Zhang C; Buck Louis GM; Hediger ML
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):221.e1-221.e16. PubMed ID: 27143399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infant Outcomes Categorized by Birth Weight Percentile for Deliveries Between 28 and 41 Weeks of Gestation.
Onishi K; Kawakita T
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 143(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 37769317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Infant Mortality Categorized by Birth Weight Percentiles for Deliveries Between 22 and 28 Weeks of Gestation.
Onishi K; Bitas C; Kawakita T
Am J Perinatol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38290555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
Akolekar R; Panaitescu AM; Ciobanu A; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS
BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Singleton birthweight by gestational age following in vitro fertilization in the United States.
Dickey RP; Xiong X; Pridjian G; Klempel MC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):101.e1-101.e13. PubMed ID: 26264826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts.
Hoftiezer L; Hof MHP; Dijs-Elsinga J; Hogeveen M; Hukkelhoven CWPM; van Lingen RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):383.e1-383.e17. PubMed ID: 30576661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Construction of intrauterine growth curves in a high altitude area of Saudi Arabia.
Al-Shehri MA; Abolfotouh MA; Nwoye LO; Eid W
Saudi Med J; 2005 Nov; 26(11):1723-7. PubMed ID: 16311655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can we improve the gestation-adjusted projection (GAP) method for prediction of birth weight in morbidly obese women?
Ahmadzia HK; Sanapo L; Thomas SM; Grotegut CA; Boyd BK
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(21):3600-3605. PubMed ID: 29681190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should Fetal Growth Charts Be References or Standards?
Hutcheon JA; Liauw J
Epidemiology; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 33074926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
