BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33449182)

  • 1. Reliability and accuracy of time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in hypervascular spinal metastases prior embolization.
    Premat K; Shotar E; Burns R; Shor N; Eloy G; Cormier É; Drir M; Morardet L; Lenck S; Sourour N; Chiras J; Dormont D; Bonaccorsi R; Clarençon F
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4690-4699. PubMed ID: 33449182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain arteriovenous malformation diagnosis: value of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T compared to DSA.
    Machet A; Portefaix C; Kadziolka K; Robin G; Lanoix O; Pierot L
    Neuroradiology; 2012 Oct; 54(10):1099-108. PubMed ID: 22407410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for pre-angiographic evaluation of suspected spinal dural arterial venous fistulas.
    Saindane AM; Boddu SR; Tong FC; Dehkharghani S; Dion JE
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2015 Feb; 7(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 24463440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy and efficiency of combined acquisition of low-dose time-resolved and single-phase high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in a single session for pre-angiographic evaluation of spinal vascular disease.
    Shin JH; Choi Y; Park B; Shin NY; Jang J; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn K; Kim BS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214289. PubMed ID: 30921365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced and TOF MR angiography for follow-up after low-profile stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms.
    Akkaya S; Akca O; Arat A; Peker A; Balci S
    Interv Neuroradiol; 2018 Dec; 24(6):655-661. PubMed ID: 29976108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.
    de Vries M; de Koning PJ; de Haan MW; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Nijenhuis RJ; Planken RN; Vasbinder GB; van Engelshoven JM; van der Geest RJ; Leiner T
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Aug; 40(8):495-503. PubMed ID: 16024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Lubicz B; Levivier M; Sadeghi N; Emonts P; Balériaux D
    J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jul; 34(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 17582496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
    Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas at 3T.
    Zhou G; Li MH; Lu C; Yin YL; Zhu YQ; Wei XE; Lu HT; Zheng QQ; Gao WW
    J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 44(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27814888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of brain and head and neck tumors with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T.
    Nishimura S; Hirai T; Shigematsu Y; Kitajima M; Morioka M; Kai Y; Minoda R; Uetani H; Murakami R; Yamashita Y
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Mar; 33(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 22116118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedal artery imaging--a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound.
    Hofmann WJ; Forstner R; Kofler B; Binder K; Ugurluoglu A; Magometschnigg H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 24(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 12323169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
    Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography.
    Lenhart M; Framme N; Völk M; Strotzer M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Finkenzeller T; Feuerbach S; Link J
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Oct; 37(10):535-41. PubMed ID: 12352161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography.
    Agid R; Willinsky RA; Lee SK; Terbrugge KG; Farb RI
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Sep; 29(8):1570-4. PubMed ID: 18499789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MR Angiographic Assessment of Endovascular Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms at 1.5 T.
    Levent A; Yuce I; Eren S; Ozyigit O; Kantarci M
    Interv Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 20(6):686-92. PubMed ID: 25496678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
    Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA.
    Zhang J; Ding S; Zhao H; Sun B; Li X; Zhou Y; Wan J; Degnan AJ; Xu J; Zhu C
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5805-5814. PubMed ID: 32529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High diagnostic performance of time-resolved MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous shunts.
    Cao L; Feng Y; Yu J; Ma Y; Zhang M; Yao X; Liu J; Ye M; He C; Li G; Hong T; Ling F; Lu J; Zhang H
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 161():110755. PubMed ID: 36868062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
    Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
    Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.