170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33449191)
1. Comparison of diagnostic performance of the ACR and Kwak TIRADS applying the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA.
Huh S; Yoon JH; Lee HS; Moon HJ; Park VY; Kwak JY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5243-5250. PubMed ID: 33449191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performances and unnecessary US-FNA rates of various TIRADS after application of equal size thresholds.
Huh S; Lee HS; Yoon J; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Kwak JY
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10632. PubMed ID: 32606433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic and therapeutic performances of three score-based Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems after application of equal size thresholds.
Si CF; Fu C; Cui YY; Li J; Huang YJ; Cui KF
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2109-2118. PubMed ID: 37064344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pattern-based vs. score-based guidelines using ultrasound features have different strengths in risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Yoon JH; Lee HS; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park VY; Kwak JY
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3793-3802. PubMed ID: 32088739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the categorization method on the diagnostic performance of ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules.
Fu C; Cui Y; Li J; Yu J; Wang Y; Si C; Cui K
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1073891. PubMed ID: 37182157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of British Thyroid Association, American College of Radiology TIRADS and Artificial Intelligence TIRADS with histological correlation: diagnostic performance for predicting thyroid malignancy and unnecessary fine needle aspiration rate.
Watkins L; O'Neill G; Young D; McArthur C
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20201444. PubMed ID: 33989038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.
Gao L; Xi X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Wang Y; Zhu S; Lai X; Zhang X; Zhao R; Zhang B
Endocrine; 2019 Apr; 64(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 30659427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of thyroid nodule FNA rates recommended by ACR TI-RADS, Kwak TI-RADS and ATA guidelines.
Qi TY; Chen X; Liu H; Mao L; Chen J; He BL; Zhang WB
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 148():110152. PubMed ID: 35033941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Langer JE; Schmidt K; Gillis LB; Nair SS; Watts JA; Snyder RW; Khot R; Rawal U; Tessler FN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 34419476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of diagnostic performance and FNA management of the ACR-TIRADS and Chinese-TIRADS based on surgical histological evidence.
Dong W; Wu Y; Cai T; Wang X
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Mar; 13(3):1711-1722. PubMed ID: 36915304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study.
Qi Q; Zhou A; Guo S; Huang X; Chen S; Li Y; Xu P
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():763897. PubMed ID: 34777258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective comparison of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS in thyroid nodule assessment for FNA-US.
Eidt LB; Nunes de Oliveira C; Lagos YBB; Solera GLM; Izquierdo R; Meyer ELS; Mattevi VS; Golbert L
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 98(3):415-425. PubMed ID: 35864563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ultrasound risk stratification systems for pediatric thyroid nodules.
Yu J; Cui Y; Fu C; Ma X; Si C; Huang Y; Cui K; Zhang Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2024; 15():1350123. PubMed ID: 38572472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The feasibility of decreasing the thresholds for biopsy in Kwak and C TIRADSs.
Fu C; Cui Y; Li J; Wang Y; Si C; Cui K
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1027802. PubMed ID: 36845721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Cai Y; Yang R; Yang S; Lu L; Ma R; Xiao Z; Lin N; Huang Y; Chen L
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jul; 13(7):4514-4525. PubMed ID: 37456322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of adult-based ATA and ACR-TIRADS ultrasound risk stratification systems in pediatric thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim PH; Yoon HM; Hwang J; Lee JS; Jung AY; Cho YA; Baek JH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7450-7463. PubMed ID: 33864505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performances of the KWAK-TIRADS classification, elasticity score, and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology of TI-RADS category 4 thyroid nodules.
Huang S; Meng N; Pan M; Yu B; Liu J; Deng K; Hu M; Zhou H; Qin C
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2020; 13(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 32509090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance rates of the ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS based on histopathological evidence.
Hekimsoy İ; Öztürk E; Ertan Y; Orman MN; Kavukçu G; Özgen AG; Özdemir M; Özbek SS
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2021 Jul; 27(4):511-518. PubMed ID: 34313236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis and Comparison of the Malignant Thyroid Nodules Not Recommended for Biopsy in ACR TIRADS and AI TIRADS With a Large Sample of Surgical Series.
Cui Y; Fu C; Si C; Li J; Kang Y; Huang Y; Cui K
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jun; 42(6):1225-1233. PubMed ID: 36394431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
