These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33449622)
1. Design Considerations to Facilitate Clinical Radiological Evaluation of Implantable Biomedical Structures. Pawelec KM; Chakravarty S; Hix JML; Perry KL; van Holsbeeck L; Fajardo R; Shapiro EM ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2021 Feb; 7(2):718-726. PubMed ID: 33449622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating Tantalum Oxide Nanoparticles into Implantable Polymeric Biomedical Devices for Radiological Monitoring. Pawelec KM; Tu E; Chakravarty S; Hix JML; Buchanan L; Kenney L; Buchanan F; Chatterjee N; Das S; Alessio A; Shapiro EM Adv Healthc Mater; 2023 Jul; 12(18):e2203167. PubMed ID: 36848875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging. Ruvio G; Solimene R; Cuccaro A; Fiaschetti G; Fagan AJ; Cournane S; Cooke J; Ammann MJ; Tobon J; Browne JE Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32340281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative imaging study in ultrasound, MRI, CT, and DSA using a multimodality renal artery phantom. King DM; Fagan AJ; Moran CM; Browne JE Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):565-73. PubMed ID: 21452693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating Radiopacity into Implantable Polymeric Biomedical Devices for Clinical Radiological Monitoring. Pawelec KM; Tu E; Chakravarty S; Hix JM; Buchanan L; Kenney L; Buchanan F; Chatterjee N; Das S; Alessio A; Shapiro EM bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visibility of fiducial markers used for image-guided radiation therapy on optical coherence tomography for registration with CT: An esophageal phantom study. Jelvehgaran P; Alderliesten T; Weda JJA; de Bruin M; Faber DJ; Hulshof MCCM; van Leeuwen TG; van Herk M; de Boer JF Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6570-6582. PubMed ID: 29023771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR conditional safety assessment of implanted medical devices: advantages of computational human phantoms. Brown JE; Rui Qiang ; Stadnik PJ; Stotts LJ; Von Arx JA Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():6465-6468. PubMed ID: 28269727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of industrial molding compounds for use in 3D ultrasound, MRI, and CT imaging phantoms. Yunker BE; Cordes D; Scherzinger AL; Dodd GD; Shandas R; Feng Y; Hunter KS Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):052905. PubMed ID: 23635298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional attachment of primary neurons and glia on radiopaque implantable biomaterials for nerve repair. Pawelec KM; Hix JML; Shapiro EM Nanomedicine; 2023 Aug; 52():102692. PubMed ID: 37328139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-resolution ultrasound in the detection of silicone gel breast implant shell failure: background, in vitro studies, and early clinical results. Bengtson BP; Eaves FF Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Feb; 32(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 22328687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography technologies to measure key structural features of polymeric biomedical implants from bench to bedside. Pawelec KM; Schoborg TA; Shapiro EM J Biomed Mater Res A; 2024 Nov; 112(11):1893-1901. PubMed ID: 38728118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative evaluation of fiducial markers for radiotherapy imaging. Chan MF; Cohen GN; Deasy JO Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 25230715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic Particle Imaging: Artifact-Free Metallic Stent Lumen Imaging in a Phantom Study. Wegner F; Friedrich T; von Gladiss A; Grzyska U; Sieren MM; Lüdtke-Buzug K; Frydrychowicz A; Buzug TM; Barkhausen J; Haegele J Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2020 Feb; 43(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 31578634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI compatibility and visibility assessment of implantable medical devices. Schueler BA; Parrish TB; Lin JC; Hammer BE; Pangrle BJ; Ritenour ER; Kucharczyk J; Truwit CL J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Apr; 9(4):596-603. PubMed ID: 10232520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of the differentiation and quantification of high-Z nanoparticles incorporated in medical devices for CT-guided interventions. Perez JVD; Jacobsen MC; Damasco JA; Melancon A; Huang SY; Layman RR; Melancon MP Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):300-312. PubMed ID: 33216978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantom evaluation of imaging modalities for silicone breast implants. Steinbach BG; Hiskes SK; Fitzsimmons JR; Lanier L Invest Radiol; 1992 Oct; 27(10):841-6. PubMed ID: 1399441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Evaluation of 3D-Printed Cardiovascular Phantoms for Interventional Planning and Training. Grab M; Hopfner C; Gesenhues A; König F; Haas NA; Hagl C; Curta A; Thierfelder N J Vis Exp; 2021 Jan; (167):. PubMed ID: 33522517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Material Composition and Implantation Site Affect in vivo Device Degradation Rate. Pawelec KM; Hix JML; Troia A; Kiupel M; Shapiro EM bioRxiv; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39314464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BaSO4-loaded agarose: a construction material for multimodality imaging phantoms. Litt HI; Brody AS Acad Radiol; 2001 May; 8(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 11345267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]