These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33449664)
61. A novel hybrid design and modelling of a customised graded Ti-6Al-4V porous hip implant to reduce stress-shielding: An experimental and numerical analysis. Naghavi SA; Tamaddon M; Garcia-Souto P; Moazen M; Taylor S; Hua J; Liu C Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1092361. PubMed ID: 36777247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Parametric Design of Porous Structure and Optimal Porosity Gradient Distribution Based on Root-Shaped Implants. Liu L; Ma S; Zhang Y; Zhu S; Wu S; Liu G; Yang G Materials (Basel); 2024 Feb; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 38473608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Characterization of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous 3D printed biomaterial: an animal study. Tanzer M; Chuang PJ; Ngo CG; Song L; TenHuisen KS Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6_Supple_B):62-67. PubMed ID: 31146557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Influence of porosity on mechanical properties and in vivo response of Ti6Al4V implants. Bandyopadhyay A; Espana F; Balla VK; Bose S; Ohgami Y; Davies NM Acta Biomater; 2010 Apr; 6(4):1640-8. PubMed ID: 19913643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Validation of finite element models for strain analysis of implant-supported prostheses using digital image correlation. Tiossi R; Vasco MA; Lin L; Conrad HJ; Bezzon OL; Ribeiro RF; Fok AS Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):788-96. PubMed ID: 23694844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [In vivo experiment of porous bioactive bone cement modified by bioglass and chitosan]. Li Y; Lei W; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Niu E; Yu L; Wu J; Zang Y; Liu Z; Wu Z Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23672134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study. Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The effect of scaffold architecture on properties of direct 3D fiber deposition of porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic implants. Li JP; de Wijn JR; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jan; 92(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19165798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty. Arabnejad S; Johnston B; Tanzer M; Pasini D J Orthop Res; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1774-1783. PubMed ID: 27664796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Different models for simulation of mechanical behaviour of porous materials. Muñoz S; Castillo SM; Torres Y J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():88-96. PubMed ID: 29414480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Porous material based on spongy titanium granules: structure, mechanical properties, and osseointegration. Rubshtein AP; Trakhtenberg ISh; Makarova EB; Triphonova EB; Bliznets DG; Yakovenkova LI; Vladimirov AB Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():363-9. PubMed ID: 24411389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines. Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants. Goshulak P; Samiezadeh S; Aziz MS; Bougherara H; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Mechanical property of Ti6Al4V cylindrical porous structure for dental implants fabricated by selective laser melting. Zhai Y; Zhang H; Liu T; Zou C; Zhou C Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Jan; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 38178700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Mechanical stability of custom-made implants: Numerical study of anatomical device and low elastic Young's modulus alloy. Didier P; Piotrowski B; Fischer M; Laheurte P Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 May; 74():399-409. PubMed ID: 28254310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Engineering the elastic modulus of NiTi cellular structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Bartolomeu F; Costa MM; Alves N; Miranda G; Silva FS J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103891. PubMed ID: 32957198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Porous versus solid shoulder implants in humeri of different bone densities: A finite element analysis. Hitchon S; Soltanmohammadi P; Milner JS; Holdsworth D; Willing R J Orthop Res; 2024 Sep; 42(9):1897-1906. PubMed ID: 38520665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Evaluation of micromotion in multirooted root analogue implants embedded in synthetic bone blocks: an in vitro study. Aldesoki M; Bourauel C; Elshazly TM; Schkommodau E; Keilig L BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):99. PubMed ID: 38233794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. Lee WT; Koak JY; Lim YJ; Kim SK; Kwon HB; Kim MJ J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 May; 100(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22331553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Stress-shielding resistant design of custom pelvic prostheses using lattice-based topology optimization. Babazadeh-Naseri A; Li G; Shourijeh MS; Akin JE; Higgs Iii CF; Fregly BJ; Dunbar NJ Med Eng Phys; 2023 Nov; 121():104012. PubMed ID: 37985018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]