These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33450171)

  • 1. Levels of Processing Affect Perceptual Features in Visual Associative Memory.
    Ovalle-Fresa R; Uslu AS; Rothen N
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Feb; 32(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 33450171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.
    Nieznański M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103127. PubMed ID: 32603912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory asymmetry of forward and backward associations in recognition tasks.
    Yang J; Zhao P; Zhu Z; Mecklinger A; Fang Z; Li H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):253-69. PubMed ID: 22924326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Levels of processing and picture memory: the physical superiority effect.
    Intraub H; Nicklos S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Apr; 11(2):284-98. PubMed ID: 3157769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modality specificity of implicit memory for new associations.
    Schacter DL; Graf P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jan; 15(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 2522139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic influence on visual working memory of object identity and location.
    Hu R; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104891. PubMed ID: 34481197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Levels-of-processing effect on internal source monitoring in schizophrenia.
    Ragland JD; McCarthy E; Bilker WB; Brensinger CM; Valdez J; Kohler C; Gur RE; Gur RC
    Psychol Med; 2006 May; 36(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16608558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theta-gamma coupling binds visual perceptual features in an associative memory task.
    Köster M; Finger H; Graetz S; Kater M; Gruber T
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17688. PubMed ID: 30523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of item distinctiveness on the retrieval of objects and object-location bindings from visual working memory.
    Markov YA; Utochkin IS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2236-2254. PubMed ID: 35199322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different involuntary mechanisms underlie priming and LOP effects in stem completion tests.
    Barnhardt TM
    Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):614-36. PubMed ID: 15615319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remembering spatial words: Sensorimotor simulation affects verbal recognition memory.
    Kumcu A; Thompson RL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Sep; 75(9):1694-1710. PubMed ID: 34704887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directed forgetting for categorised pictures: recognition memory for perceptual details versus gist.
    Ahmad FN; Tan P; Hockley WE
    Memory; 2019 Aug; 27(7):894-903. PubMed ID: 30849286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.
    Josephs EL; Draschkow D; Wolfe JM; Võ ML
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():100-108. PubMed ID: 27270227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional demands and recall of verbal and color information in action events.
    Bäckman L; Nilsson LG; Nourp RK
    Scand J Psychol; 1993 Sep; 34(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 8378754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reciprocal semantic predictions drive categorization of scene contexts and objects even when they are separate.
    Leroy A; Faure S; Spotorno S
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8447. PubMed ID: 32439874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural Architecture for Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 37(14):3913-3925. PubMed ID: 28270569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concreteness and levels of processing: a test of the dual-coding hypothesis using dynamic visual noise.
    Anderson BA; Peterson SA
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1405-1420. PubMed ID: 36097651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: new findings and theoretical implications.
    Challis BH; Velichkovsky BM; Craik FI
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):142-64. PubMed ID: 8733928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory.
    von Hippel W; Hawkins C
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 7991350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.