53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33450250)
1. FOXO4 Transactivation Domain Interaction with Forkhead DNA Binding Domain and Effect on Selective DNA Recognition for Transcription Initiation.
Kim J; Ahn D; Park CJ
J Mol Biol; 2021 Feb; 433(4):166808. PubMed ID: 33450250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioinformatics procedure for investigating senolytic (anti-aging) agents: A digital signal processing technique.
Nwankwo N; Okafor I
Aging Med (Milton); 2023 Dec; 6(4):338-346. PubMed ID: 38239718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bispecific Forkhead Transcription Factor FoxN3 Recognizes Two Distinct Motifs with Different DNA Shapes.
Rogers JM; Waters CT; Seegar TCM; Jarrett SM; Hallworth AN; Blacklow SC; Bulyk ML
Mol Cell; 2019 Apr; 74(2):245-253.e6. PubMed ID: 30826165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction between the transactivation domain of p53 and PC4 exemplifies acidic activation domains as single-stranded DNA mimics.
Rajagopalan S; Andreeva A; Teufel DP; Freund SM; Fersht AR
J Biol Chem; 2009 Aug; 284(32):21728-37. PubMed ID: 19525231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current perspective on the regulation of FOXO4 and its role in disease progression.
Liu W; Li Y; Luo B
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2020 Feb; 77(4):651-663. PubMed ID: 31529218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction of the transactivation domain of B-Myb with the TAZ2 domain of the coactivator p300: molecular features and properties of the complex.
Oka O; Waters LC; Strong SL; Dosanjh NS; Veverka V; Muskett FW; Renshaw PS; Klempnauer KH; Carr MD
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52906. PubMed ID: 23300815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structure of tumor suppressor p53 and its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domain.
Wells M; Tidow H; Rutherford TJ; Markwick P; Jensen MR; Mylonas E; Svergun DI; Blackledge M; Fersht AR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Apr; 105(15):5762-7. PubMed ID: 18391200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An order-to-disorder structural switch activates the FoxM1 transcription factor.
Marceau AH; Brison CM; Nerli S; Arsenault HE; McShan AC; Chen E; Lee HW; Benanti JA; Sgourakis NG; Rubin SM
Elife; 2019 May; 8():. PubMed ID: 31134895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The crystal structure of human forkhead box N1 in complex with DNA reveals the structural basis for forkhead box family specificity.
Newman JA; Aitkenhead H; Gavard AE; Rota IA; Handel AE; Hollander GA; Gileadi O
J Biol Chem; 2020 Mar; 295(10):2948-2958. PubMed ID: 31914405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification and characterisation of a novel interaction between oestrogen receptor alpha and FOXP2.
Lakhi A; Fanucchi S
Biochimie; 2024 Jun; 221():65-74. PubMed ID: 38296156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The forkhead DNA-binding domain binds specific G2-rich RNA sequences.
Zutterling C; Todeschini AL; Fourmy D; Busso D; Veaute X; Ducongé F; Veitia RA
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Dec; 51(22):12367-12380. PubMed ID: 37933840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissecting the transactivation domain (tAD) of the transcription factor c-Myb to assess recent models of tAD function.
Naes G; Storesund JO; Udayakumar PD; Ledsaak M; Gabrielsen OS
FEBS Open Bio; 2020 Nov; 10(11):2329-2342. PubMed ID: 32937031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unraveling the interplay between the leucine zipper and forkhead domains of FOXP2: Implications for DNA binding, stability and dynamics.
Perumal CM; Thulo M; Buthelezi S; Naicker P; Stoychev S; Lahki A; Fanucchi S
Proteins; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38747678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanism of forkhead transcription factors binding to a novel palindromic DNA site.
Li J; Dai S; Chen X; Liang X; Qu L; Jiang L; Guo M; Zhou Z; Wei H; Zhang H; Chen Z; Chen L; Chen Y
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Apr; 49(6):3573-3583. PubMed ID: 33577686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription.
Chong S; Dugast-Darzacq C; Liu Z; Dong P; Dailey GM; Cattoglio C; Heckert A; Banala S; Lavis L; Darzacq X; Tjian R
Science; 2018 Jul; 361(6400):. PubMed ID: 29930090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FOXP3 recognizes microsatellites and bridges DNA through multimerization.
Zhang W; Leng F; Wang X; Ramirez RN; Park J; Benoist C; Hur S
Nature; 2023 Dec; 624(7991):433-441. PubMed ID: 38030726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA binding by FOXP3 domain-swapped dimer suggests mechanisms of long-range chromosomal interactions.
Chen Y; Chen C; Zhang Z; Liu CC; Johnson ME; Espinoza CA; Edsall LE; Ren B; Zhou XJ; Grant SF; Wells AD; Chen L
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jan; 43(2):1268-82. PubMed ID: 25567984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commonly asked questions about transcriptional activation domains.
Udupa A; Kotha SR; Staller MV
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2024 Feb; 84():102732. PubMed ID: 38056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In control of biology: of mice, men and Foxes.
Wijchers PJ; Burbach JP; Smidt MP
Biochem J; 2006 Jul; 397(2):233-46. PubMed ID: 16792526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stochastic ratchet mechanisms for replacement of proteins bound to DNA.
Cocco S; Marko JF; Monasson R
Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Jun; 112(23):238101. PubMed ID: 24972228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
