These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33450753)
41. Features of non-mass enhancing lesions detected on 1.5 T breast MRI: a radiologic and pathologic analysis. Choudhery S; Lynch B; Sahoo S; Seiler SJ Breast Dis; 2015; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 25061022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mucocele-like lesions diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Low risk of upgrade and subsequent carcinoma. Zhang G; Ataya D; L Lebda P; Calhoun BC Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 29024198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Revisiting Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Analysis of Outcomes and Follow-Up Using the Updated BI-RADS Atlas. Chikarmane SA; Michaels AY; Giess CS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 28834447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Active surveillance of women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia on core needle biopsy may spare many women potentially unnecessary surgery, but at the risk of undertreatment for a minority: 10-year surgical outcomes of 114 consecutive cases from a single center. Farshid G; Edwards S; Kollias J; Gill PG Mod Pathol; 2018 Mar; 31(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 29099502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of Features in Probably Benign and Malignant Nonmass Enhancement in Breast MRI. Ahmadinejad N; Azizinik F; Khosravi P; Torabi A; Mohajeri A; Arian A Int J Breast Cancer; 2024; 2024():6661849. PubMed ID: 38523651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: imaging characteristics, outcome of surgical excision or imaging follow-up. Okamoto S; Chen ST; Covelli JD; DeMartini WB; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM Breast Cancer; 2020 May; 27(3):405-414. PubMed ID: 31838725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer. Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Advocating Nonsurgical Management of Patients With Small, Incidental Radial Scars at the Time of Needle Core Biopsy: A Study of 77 Cases. Matrai C; D'Alfonso TM; Pharmer L; Drotman MB; Simmons RM; Shin SJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Sep; 139(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 25607999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Preoperative breast MRI in management of patients with needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). van Bekkum S; Ter Braak BPM; Plaisier PW; van Rosmalen J; Menke-Pluijmers MBE; Westenend PJ Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt A):1854-1860. PubMed ID: 32624292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. Meeuwis C; Peters NH; Mali WP; Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Schipper ME; van den Bosch MA Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 17218074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic Performance of Fused Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Using Unenhanced or Postcontrast T1-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients With Breast Cancer. Shin HJ; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Ha SM; Park JY; Shin KC; Cha JH; Kim HH Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Apr; 95(17):e3502. PubMed ID: 27124054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Is core needle biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions? Masood S; Loya A; Khalbuss W Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jun; 28(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 12768640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Long term clinical follow-up of atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Pathology; 2016 Jan; 48(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 27020205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components. Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnosis of Papillary Breast Lesions on Core Needle Biopsy: Upgrade Rates and Interobserver Variability. Qiu L; Mais DD; Nicolas M; Nanyes J; Kist K; Nazarullah A Int J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 27(7):736-743. PubMed ID: 31187678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Papillomas and atypical papillomas in breast core needle biopsy specimens: risk of carcinoma in subsequent excision. Renshaw AA; Derhagopian RP; Tizol-Blanco DM; Gould EW Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Aug; 122(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 15323138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy does not always mandate excisional biopsy. Srour MK; Donovan C; Chung A; Harit A; Dadmanesh F; Giuliano AE; Amersi F Breast J; 2020 Apr; 26(4):679-684. PubMed ID: 31562689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]