These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33453643)

  • 1. Comparing and modeling absolute auditory thresholds in an alternative-forced-choice and a yes-no procedure.
    Heil P
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108164. PubMed ID: 33453643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A probabilistic Poisson-based model accounts for an extensive set of absolute auditory threshold measurements.
    Heil P; Matysiak A; Neubauer H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():135-161. PubMed ID: 28716582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absolute auditory threshold: testing the absolute.
    Heil P; Matysiak A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1224-1233. PubMed ID: 29094506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: Thresholds for multicomponent stimuli.
    Heil P; Mohamed ESI; Matysiak A
    Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 410():108349. PubMed ID: 34530356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: distributions of the first-spike latencies of auditory-nerve fibers.
    Heil P; Neubauer H; Brown M; Irvine DR
    Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 238(1-2):25-38. PubMed ID: 18077116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The single interval adjustment matrix (SIAM) yes-no task: an empirical assessment using auditory and gustatory stimuli.
    Shepherd D; Hautus MJ; Stocks MA; Quek SY
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1934-47. PubMed ID: 21533962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further studies of a maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure.
    Gu X; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jul; 96(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 8064025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures.
    Marshall L; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Mar; 29(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 3702383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.
    Heil P; Neubauer H; Tiefenau A; von Specht H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 7(3):279-98. PubMed ID: 16823660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling detection thresholds for sounds repeated at different delays.
    Heil P; Verhey JL; Zoefel B
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():83-95. PubMed ID: 23268356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal integration of infrasound at threshold.
    Friedrich B; Joost H; Fedtke T; Verhey JL
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0289216. PubMed ID: 37523364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A probabilistic model of absolute auditory thresholds and its possible physiological basis.
    Heil P; Neubauer H; Tetschke M; Irvine DR
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():21-9. PubMed ID: 23716205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
    Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Signal detection theoretical aspects of various threshold detection procedures].
    Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Jun; 81(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 12063624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive threshold estimation with unforced-choice tasks.
    Kaernbach C
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1377-88. PubMed ID: 11800463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure.
    Leek MR; Dubno JR; He N; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84. PubMed ID: 10830389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observation of nociceptive detection thresholds and cortical evoked potentials: Go/no-go versus two-interval forced choice.
    van den Berg B; Vanwinsen L; Pezzali G; Buitenweg JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1359-1369. PubMed ID: 35381960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric functions for gap detection in a yes-no procedure.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Geng W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3512-20. PubMed ID: 10615691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thresholds of auditory-motor coupling measured with a simple task in musicians and non-musicians: was the sound simultaneous to the key press?
    van Vugt FT; Tillmann B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87176. PubMed ID: 24498299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Grose JH; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27438873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.