243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33454029)
1. Assessing rectal temperature with a novel non-invasive sensor.
Tsadok I; Scheinowitz M; Shpitzer SA; Ketko I; Epstein Y; Yanovich R
J Therm Biol; 2021 Jan; 95():102788. PubMed ID: 33454029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring core body temperature with a non-invasive sensor.
Mazgaoker S; Ketko I; Yanovich R; Heled Y; Epstein Y
J Therm Biol; 2017 May; 66():17-20. PubMed ID: 28477905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zero-Heat-Flux Thermometry for Non-Invasive Measurement of Core Body Temperature in Pigs.
Guschlbauer M; Maul AC; Yan X; Herff H; Annecke T; Sterner-Kock A; Böttiger BW; Schroeder DC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150759. PubMed ID: 26938613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive zero-heat-flux technology compared with traditional core temperature measurements in the emergency department.
Hart D; Rischall M; Durgin K; Donoghue M; Pham T; Wyatt T; Stang J; DeVries P; Driver B
Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2383-2386. PubMed ID: 33041152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Infrared tympanic temperature as a predictor of rectal temperature in warm and hot conditions.
Hansen RD; Amos D; Leake B
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1048-52. PubMed ID: 8908342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Circadian rhythms in bed rest: Monitoring core body temperature via heat-flux approach is superior to skin surface temperature.
Mendt S; Maggioni MA; Nordine M; Steinach M; Opatz O; Belavý D; Felsenberg D; Koch J; Shang P; Gunga HC; Stahn A
Chronobiol Int; 2017; 34(5):666-676. PubMed ID: 27726448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heat flux systems for body core temperature assessment during exercise.
Daanen HAM; Kohlen V; Teunissen LPJ
J Therm Biol; 2023 Feb; 112():103480. PubMed ID: 36796923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability of devices that assess body temperature during indoor exercise in the heat.
Ganio MS; Brown CM; Casa DJ; Becker SM; Yeargin SW; McDermott BP; Boots LM; Boyd PW; Armstrong LE; Maresh CM
J Athl Train; 2009; 44(2):124-35. PubMed ID: 19295956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temperature Measurement Inside Protective Headgear: Comparison With Core Temperatures and Indicators of Physiological Strain During Exercise in a Hot Environment.
Mitchell JB; Goldston KR; Adams AN; Crisp KM; Franklin BB; Kreutzer A; Montalvo DX; Turner MG; Phillips MD
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):866-74. PubMed ID: 26259634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rectal and Bladder Temperatures vs Forehead Core Temperatures Measured With SpotOn Monitoring System.
Schell-Chaple HM; Liu KD; Matthay MA; Puntillo KA
Am J Crit Care; 2018 Jan; 27(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 29292274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the body core temperature of recreational athletes at the end of a 10 km self-paced run under environmental heat stress.
Andrade MT; Nunes-Leite MMS; Bruzzi RS; Souza CH; Uendeles-Pinto JP; Prado LS; Soares DD; Gonçalves DAP; Coimbra CC; Wanner SP
Exp Physiol; 2023 Jun; 108(6):852-864. PubMed ID: 37018484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-operative temperature monitoring with cutaneous zero-heat- flux-thermometry in comparison with oesophageal temperature: A prospective study in the paediatric population.
Carvalho H; Najafi N; Poelaert J
Paediatr Anaesth; 2019 Aug; 29(8):865-871. PubMed ID: 31034706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat flux technology (3M SpotOn sensor) in comparison with sublingual and nasopharyngeal temperature: An observational study.
Iden T; Horn EP; Bein B; Böhm R; Beese J; Höcker J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 25693138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of rectal temperature by the Questemp II personal heat strain monitor under low and moderate heat stress.
Green JM; Clapp AJ; Gu DL; Bishop PA
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 10635547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forehead or ear temperature measurement cannot replace rectal measurements, except for screening purposes.
Mogensen CB; Wittenhoff L; Fruerhøj G; Hansen S
BMC Pediatr; 2018 Jan; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 29373961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of estimated core body temperature measured with the BioHarness and rectal temperature under several heat stress conditions.
Seo Y; DiLeo T; Powell JB; Kim JH; Roberge RJ; Coca A
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Aug; 13(8):612-20. PubMed ID: 26954265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Zero-heat-flux thermometry over the carotid artery in assessment of core temperature in craniotomy patients.
Silvasti-Lundell M; Makkonen O; Kivisaari R; Luostarinen T; Pesonen E; Mäkinen MT
J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Oct; 37(5):1153-1159. PubMed ID: 36879085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of devices that assess body temperature during outdoor exercise in the heat.
Casa DJ; Becker SM; Ganio MS; Brown CM; Yeargin SW; Roti MW; Siegler J; Blowers JA; Glaviano NR; Huggins RA; Armstrong LE; Maresh CM
J Athl Train; 2007; 42(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 18059987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individualized monitoring of heat illness risk: novel adaptive physiological strain index to assess exercise-heat strain from athletes to fully encapsulated workers.
Buller MJ; Atkinson E; Driver K; Tharion WJ; Ely BR; Cheuvront SN; Charkoudian N
Physiol Meas; 2023 Oct; 44(10):. PubMed ID: 37703905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the accuracy of zero-flux and ingestible thermometers in the peri-operative setting.
Jack JM; Ellicott H; Jones CI; Bremner SA; Densham I; Harper CM
J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 30623279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]