133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33454359)
21. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modeling the Urology Residency Application and Match Process: A Mathematical Argument for Application and Interview Caps.
Farooq S; Mehta A
Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():48-54. PubMed ID: 36572222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Role of Geography in the AUA Residency Match.
Anwar T; Wakefield M; Murray KS
J Urol; 2020 Jun; 203(6):1070-1071. PubMed ID: 32202460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Capturing the Perspective of Prospective Urology Applicants: Impacts of COVID-19 on Medical Education.
Hanson KA; Borofsky MS; Hampson LA; Breyer BN; Kern NG; Conti SL; Kielb SJ; Sorensen MD
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():36-42. PubMed ID: 33007312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Asadourian PA; Murphy AI; Marano AA; Rohde CH; Wu JK
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):1923-1929. PubMed ID: 34210645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Understanding the Match: The Effect of Signaling, Demographics, and Applicant Characteristics on Match Success in the Orthopaedic Residency Application Process.
Kotlier JL; Mihalic AP; Petrigliano FA; Liu JN
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Mar; 32(5):e231-e239. PubMed ID: 38154087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives.
Drolet BC; Brower JP; Lifchez SD; Janis JE; Liu PY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 27018690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?
Sebesta EM; Lipsky MJ; Nunez M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():37-43. PubMed ID: 29935263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Urology Residency Match and Geographic Proximity of Applicants.
Wang KR; Shah YB; Simhal RK; Quinn A; Denisenko A; Mann E; Clark J; Raikin J; Lallas CD
Urology; 2023 Jun; 176():21-27. PubMed ID: 36963668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influencing Factors of Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match.
Kim JK; Morrison B; Bylund J; Rasper A; Dropkin BM
Urology; 2023 May; 175():35-41. PubMed ID: 36805414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Financial Burden of Applying to Urology Residency in 2020.
Tabakin AL; Srivastava A; Polotti CF; Gupta NK
Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():62-67. PubMed ID: 33476604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Content Analysis of ACGME Accredited Urology Residency Program Webpages.
Patel BG; Gallo K; Cherullo EE; Chow AK
Urology; 2020 Apr; 138():11-15. PubMed ID: 31954168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Costs of U.S. Allopathic Medical Students Applying to Neurosurgery Residency: Geographic Considerations and Implications for the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.
Gordon AM; Malik AT
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e783-e789. PubMed ID: 33831614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defining the Current Landscape of Women in Urology: An Analysis of Female Applicants, Residents, and Faculty at AUA-Accredited Residency Programs.
Findlay BL; Manka MG; Bole R; Dodge NA; Thompson RH; Granberg CF
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():59-63. PubMed ID: 33301743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step-1 Score as a Screening Tool for Orthopaedic Surgery Away Rotations.
Huebner C; Adnan M; Kraeutler MJ; Brown S; Mulcahey MK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Oct; 101(20):e106. PubMed ID: 31626014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contemporary Assessment of Match Violations within Urology: an Opportunity for Ethical Leadership.
Balen A; Fantasia J; Thavaseelan S
Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Sep; 20(10):65. PubMed ID: 31493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Surgical Skills of Urology Resident Applicants: Four-Year Experience.
Karani R; Tapiero S; Jefferson FA; Vernez S; Xie L; Larson KN; Osann K; Okhunov Z; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV; Stephany HA
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):2030-2037. PubMed ID: 34147416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
