133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33454373)
1. Required examinations and tests before initiating contraception: Provider practices from a national cross-sectional survey.
Krashin JW; Zapata LB; Morgan IA; Tepper NK; Jatlaoui TC; Frederiksen BN; Whiteman MK; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 33454373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of Potentially Unnecessary Bimanual Pelvic Examinations and Papanicolaou Tests Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Aged 15-20 Years in the United States.
Qin J; Saraiya M; Martinez G; Sawaya GF
JAMA Intern Med; 2020 Feb; 180(2):274-280. PubMed ID: 31904768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.
Evans D; Goldstein S; Loewy A; Altman AD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Aug; 41(8):1221-1234. PubMed ID: 31331610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraception.
Henderson JT; Sawaya GF; Blum M; Stratton L; Harper CC
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 21099589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of Insurance Status With Provision of Recommended Services During Comprehensive Postpartum Visits.
Geissler K; Ranchoff BL; Cooper MI; Attanasio LB
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025095. PubMed ID: 33170263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the usefulness of the 'hormones with optional pelvic exam' programme offered at a family planning clinic.
Armstrong L; Zabel E; Beydoun HA
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2012 Aug; 17(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 22524280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health Care Provider Attitudes and Practices Related to 'Quick Start' Provision of Combined Hormonal Contraception and Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate to Adolescents.
Morgan IA; Ermias Y; Zapata LB; Curtis KM; Whiteman MK
J Adolesc Health; 2019 Feb; 64(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 30392865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Nov; 37(11):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26629725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
Black A; Guilbert E; ; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman WV; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; ; Ferguson C; Fortin C; Kielly M; Mansouri S; Todd N;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Oct; 37(10):936-42. PubMed ID: 26606712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Routine pelvic examinations: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines.
Kling JM; Vegunta S; Al-Badri M; Faubion SS; Fields HE; Shah AA; Wallace MR; Ruddy BE; Bryan MJ; Temkit M; MacLaughlin KL
Prev Med; 2017 Jan; 94():60-64. PubMed ID: 27856341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical Cancer Screening, Pelvic Examinations, and Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Females.
Vinekar KS; Vahratian A; Hall KS; West BT; Caldwell A; Bell JD; Dalton VK
J Adolesc Health; 2015 Aug; 57(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 26026477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do new guidelines and technology make the routine pelvic examination obsolete?
Westhoff CL; Jones HE; Guiahi M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jan; 20(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21194307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in US health care provider attitudes related to contraceptive safety before and after the release of National Guidance.
Zapata LB; Morgan IA; Curtis KM; Folger SG; Whiteman MK
Contraception; 2019 Nov; 100(5):413-419. PubMed ID: 31369735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should the annual pelvic examination go the way of annual cervical cytology?
MacLaughlin KL; Faubion SS; Long ME; Pruthi S; Casey PM
Womens Health (Lond); 2014 Jul; 10(4):373-84. PubMed ID: 25259899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Survey of Family Planning Training, Knowledge, and Practices Among Health Care Providers Within the Military Health System at Joint Base Lewis-McChord.
Deans EI; Batig AL; Cordes S; Scribner AN; Nielsen PE; Jamieson DJ; Lathrop E; Cwiak C
Mil Med; 2019 May; 184(5-6):e394-e399. PubMed ID: 30252078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Physical examination prior to initiating hormonal contraception: a systematic review.
Tepper NK; Curtis KM; Steenland MW; Marchbanks PA
Contraception; 2013 May; 87(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 23121820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Provision of contraception: a survey among primary care physicians in Finland.
Sannisto T; Kosunen E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 20423277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetrician-gynecologists' beliefs on the importance of pelvic examinations in assessing hormonal contraception eligibility.
Yu JM; Henderson JT; Harper CC; Sawaya GF
Contraception; 2014 Dec; 90(6):612-4. PubMed ID: 25108582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.
Daniele MAS; Cleland J; Benova L; Ali M
Reprod Health; 2017 Sep; 14(1):119. PubMed ID: 28950913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
