163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33455330)
21. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.
Kim JA; Lim J; Naren R; Yun HS; Park EK
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():155-67. PubMed ID: 27554019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mesoporous bioactive glass nanolayer-functionalized 3D-printed scaffolds for accelerating osteogenesis and angiogenesis.
Zhang Y; Xia L; Zhai D; Shi M; Luo Y; Feng C; Fang B; Yin J; Chang J; Wu C
Nanoscale; 2015 Dec; 7(45):19207-21. PubMed ID: 26525451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rational design and fabrication of monophasic bioceramic microspheres with enhanced mechanical and biological performances in reconstruction of segmental bone defect.
Cong Y; Liang Z; Jianping N; Wenyue H; Prince GE; Zhang X
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Jun; 60(6):1691-1703. PubMed ID: 35435567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 3D-printed scaffolds with bioactive elements-induced photothermal effect for bone tumor therapy.
Liu Y; Li T; Ma H; Zhai D; Deng C; Wang J; Zhuo S; Chang J; Wu C
Acta Biomater; 2018 Jun; 73():531-546. PubMed ID: 29656075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn/bioceramic composite scaffolds.
Dong J; Lin P; Putra NE; Tümer N; Leeflang MA; Huan Z; Fratila-Apachitei LE; Chang J; Zadpoor AA; Zhou J
Acta Biomater; 2022 Oct; 151():628-646. PubMed ID: 35940565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Porous composite scaffold incorporating osteogenic phytomolecule icariin for promoting skeletal regeneration in challenging osteonecrotic bone in rabbits.
Lai Y; Cao H; Wang X; Chen S; Zhang M; Wang N; Yao Z; Dai Y; Xie X; Zhang P; Yao X; Qin L
Biomaterials; 2018 Jan; 153():1-13. PubMed ID: 29096397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Supercritical CO
Li S; Song C; Yang S; Yu W; Zhang W; Zhang G; Xi Z; Lu E
Acta Biomater; 2019 Aug; 94():253-267. PubMed ID: 31154054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional Printed Mg-Doped β-TCP Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Effects of Magnesium Ion Concentration on Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis
Gu Y; Zhang J; Zhang X; Liang G; Xu T; Niu W
Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2019 Aug; 16(4):415-429. PubMed ID: 31413945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigating the mechanical, physiochemical and osteogenic properties in gelatin-chitosan-bioactive nanoceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo.
Dasgupta S; Maji K; Nandi SK
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Jan; 94():713-728. PubMed ID: 30423758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Appreciable biosafety, biocompatibility and osteogenic capability of 3D printed nonstoichiometric wollastonite scaffolds favorable for clinical translation.
Wei Y; Wang Z; Lei L; Han J; Zhong S; Yang X; Gou Z; Chen L
J Orthop Translat; 2024 Mar; 45():88-99. PubMed ID: 38516038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Novel Extrusion-Microdrilling Approach to Fabricate Calcium Phosphate-Based Bioceramic Scaffolds Enabling Fast Bone Regeneration.
He F; Lu T; Fang X; Feng S; Feng S; Tian Y; Li Y; Zuo F; Deng X; Ye J
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Jul; 12(29):32340-32351. PubMed ID: 32597161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Precisely Tuning the Pore-Wall Surface Composition of Bioceramic Scaffolds Facilitates Angiogenesis and Orbital Bone Defect Repair.
Peng Y; Wang J; Dai X; Chen M; Bao Z; Yang X; Xie J; Wang C; Shao J; Han H; Yao K; Gou Z; Ye J
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2022 Sep; 14(38):43987-44001. PubMed ID: 36102779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bioactive polymeric-ceramic hybrid 3D scaffold for application in bone tissue regeneration.
Torres AL; Gaspar VM; Serra IR; Diogo GS; Fradique R; Silva AP; Correia IJ
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2013 Oct; 33(7):4460-9. PubMed ID: 23910366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Degradation and silicon excretion of the calcium silicate bioactive ceramics during bone regeneration using rabbit femur defect model.
Lin K; Liu Y; Huang H; Chen L; Wang Z; Chang J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Jun; 26(6):197. PubMed ID: 26099345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of osteogenic capability of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds and granules with different porosities for clinical translation.
Yue X; Zhao L; Yang J; Jiao X; Wu F; Zhang Y; Li Y; Qiu J; Ke X; Sun X; Yang X; Gou Z; Zhang L; Yang G
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1260639. PubMed ID: 37840661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The in vitro and in vivo cementogenesis of CaMgSi₂O₆ bioceramic scaffolds.
Zhang Y; Li S; Wu C
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 Jan; 102(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 23596060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bioactive glass-reinforced bioceramic ink writing scaffolds: sintering, microstructure and mechanical behavior.
Shao H; Yang X; He Y; Fu J; Liu L; Ma L; Zhang L; Yang G; Gao C; Gou Z
Biofabrication; 2015 Sep; 7(3):035010. PubMed ID: 26355654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hierarchical bioceramic scaffolds with 3D-plotted macropores and mussel-inspired surface nanolayers for stimulating osteogenesis.
Xu M; Zhai D; Xia L; Li H; Chen S; Fang B; Chang J; Wu C
Nanoscale; 2016 Jul; 8(28):13790-803. PubMed ID: 27380634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Mechanical properties of polylactic acid/beta-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffold with double channels based on three-dimensional printing technique].
Lian Q; Zhuang P; Li C; Jin Z; Li D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 28(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 24844010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PGA/beta-TCP for bone tissue engineering.
Cao H; Kuboyama N
Bone; 2010 Feb; 46(2):386-95. PubMed ID: 19800045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
