These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3345655)

  • 1. Computer system for quantitative evaluation of an electrotactile vocoder for artificial hearing.
    Ozdamar O; Oller DK; Miskiel E; Eilers R
    Comput Biomed Res; 1988 Feb; 21(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 3345655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of vocoder filter configuration on tactual perception of speech.
    Eilers RE; Ozdamar O; Oller DK; Miskiel E; Urbano R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(4):51-64. PubMed ID: 2600868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FFT-based digital tactile vocoder system for real-time use.
    Ozdamar O; Lopez CN; Oller DK; Eilers RE; Miskiel E; Lynch MP
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1992 Mar; 30(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 1453787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment techniques to evaluate tactual aids for hearing-impaired subjects.
    Eilers RE; Widen JE; Oller DK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(2):33-46. PubMed ID: 3361459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception by congenitally deaf subjects using an electrocutaneous vocoder.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Lavoie L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(3):41-50. PubMed ID: 2970542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactual speech perception by minimally trained deaf subjects.
    Oller DK; Payne SL; Gavin WJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):769-78. PubMed ID: 6449633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of multiple electrode stimulus patterns: implications for design of an electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):360-8. PubMed ID: 1825833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactual perception of speech-like stimuli with an electrocutaneous vocoder.
    Eilers RE; Bull DH; Oller DK
    Artif Organs; 1984 Nov; 8(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 6239611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a principal-components tactile aid for the hearing-impaired.
    Weisenberger JM; Craig JC; Abbott GD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1944-57. PubMed ID: 1960288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Alcántara JI; Blombery PA; Hopkins IJ; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid.
    Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lipreading sentences with vibrotactile vocoders: performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Bernstein LE; Demorest ME; Coulter DC; O'Connell MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):2971-84. PubMed ID: 1838561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuing evaluation of the Queen's University tactile vocoder. I: Identification of open set words.
    Brooks PL; Frost BJ; Mason JL; Gibson DM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 3958993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable steps.
    Stafford RC; Stafford JW; Wells JD; Loizou PC; Keller MD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 24322978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor in a cochlear implant program for profoundly hearing-impaired adults.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Galvin KL; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2026287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of frequency change on discrimination of pulse bursts in an electrocutaneous tactual vocoder.
    Bull D; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Mandalia BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1192-8. PubMed ID: 3156905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of two multichannel tactile aids for the hearing impaired.
    Weisenberger JM; Broadstone SM; Saunders FA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1764-75. PubMed ID: 2808925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved electrotactile speech processor: Tickle Talker.
    Cowan RS; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Millard R; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():454-6. PubMed ID: 7668750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposed use of a digital signal processor in an experimental tactile hearing aid for the profoundly deaf: preliminary communication.
    Mathijssen RW; Leliveld WH
    J Med Eng Technol; 1989; 13(1-2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2733017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.