These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33457546)

  • 1. Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
    Zillioux J; Pike CW; Sharma D; Rapp DE
    J Patient Exp; 2020 Dec; 7(6):1062-1067. PubMed ID: 33457546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online Ratings of Urologists: Comprehensive Analysis.
    Pike CW; Zillioux J; Rapp D
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e12436. PubMed ID: 31267982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Analysis of Online Ratings of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jay JH; Runge NE; Vergara FH; Sabatini CS; Oni JK
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2021 Oct; 41(9):576-579. PubMed ID: 34387231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
    Sobin L; Goyal P
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):635-8. PubMed ID: 24876073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology.
    Basa K; Jabbour N; Rohlfing M; Schmoker S; Lawlor CM; Levi J; Sobin L; Tracy JC; Tracy LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Dec; 130(12):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 33813874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites.
    Nwachukwu BU; Adjei J; Trehan SK; Chang B; Amoo-Achampong K; Nguyen JT; Taylor SA; McCormick F; Ranawat AS
    HSS J; 2016 Oct; 12(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27703422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online Reviews of American Urologists and Opportunities for Improvement.
    Khan HI; Franks NJ; Liu Q; Choi BY; Smith ER; Daskovich TJ; Liss MA
    Urol Pract; 2020 Nov; 7(6):474-480. PubMed ID: 37287182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data Accuracy and Predictors of High Ratings of Colon and Rectal Surgeons on an Online Physician Rating Website.
    Hill SS; Hoang CM; Cheraghi SN; Shabo MR; Resnick AJ; Crawford A; Melnitchouk N; Harnsberger CR; Alavi K; Sturrock PR; Maykel JA; Davids JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Feb; 63(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31914115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of Social Media Presence with Online Physician Ratings and Surgical Volume Among California Urologists: Observational Study.
    Houman J; Weinberger J; Caron A; Hannemann A; Zaliznyak M; Patel D; Moradzadeh A; Daskivich TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Aug; 21(8):e10195. PubMed ID: 31411141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.
    Prabhu AV; Randhawa S; Clump D; Heron DE; Beriwal S
    Cureus; 2018 Feb; 10(2):e2165. PubMed ID: 29644154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Analysis of Online Ratings of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
    Runge NE; Jay JH; Vergara FH; Oni JK
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 May; 35(5):1432-1436. PubMed ID: 31973969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of Gender Differences in H-index Within Urological Subspecialties.
    Findlay BL; Lyon TD; Bearrick EN; Robinson M; Viers BR; Ball CT; Anderson KT
    J Urol; 2023 Aug; 210(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 37154679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.