142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33458267)
1. Utilisation of Pareto navigation techniques to calibrate a fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning solution.
Wheeler PA; Chu M; Holmes R; Smyth M; Maggs R; Spezi E; Staffurth J; Lewis DG; Millin AE
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 10():41-48. PubMed ID: 33458267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the application of Pareto navigation guided automated radiotherapy treatment planning to prostate cancer.
Wheeler PA; Chu M; Holmes R; Woodley OW; Jones CS; Maggs R; Staffurth J; Palaniappan N; Spezi E; Lewis DG; Campbell S; Fitzgibbon J; Millin AE
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():220-226. PubMed ID: 31526670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PNaV: A tool for generating a high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan by navigating the Pareto surface guided by the visualization of multidimensional trade-offs.
Deufel CL; Epelman MA; Pasupathy KS; Sir MY; Wu VW; Herman MG
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(4):518-531. PubMed ID: 32423786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PARETO: A novel evolutionary optimization approach to multiobjective IMRT planning.
Fiege J; McCurdy B; Potrebko P; Champion H; Cull A
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5217-29. PubMed ID: 21978066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of database quality in knowledge-based treatment planning for prostate cancer.
Wall PDH; Carver RL; Fontenot JD
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(6):437-444. PubMed ID: 29730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using deep learning to predict beam-tunable Pareto optimal dose distribution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Bohara G; Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie A; Jiang S; Nguyen D
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3898-3912. PubMed ID: 32621789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Kamal Sayed H; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2049-2060. PubMed ID: 32077497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated intensity modulated treatment planning: The expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.
Zarepisheh M; Hong L; Zhou Y; Oh JH; Mechalakos JG; Hunt MA; Mageras GS; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2944-2954. PubMed ID: 31055858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatically configuring the reference point method for automated multi-objective treatment planning.
van Haveren R; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035002. PubMed ID: 30566906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients.
Voet PW; Dirkx ML; Breedveld S; Al-Mamgani A; Incrocci L; Heijmen BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1175-9. PubMed ID: 24529714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive method for multicriteria optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Kamal-Sayed H; Ma J; Tseung H; Abdel-Rehim A; Herman MG; Beltran CJ
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5643-5652. PubMed ID: 30332515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plan averaging for multicriteria navigation of sliding window IMRT and VMAT.
Craft D; Papp D; Unkelbach J
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021709. PubMed ID: 24506600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dosimetric impact of leaf interdigitation and leaf width on VMAT treatment planning in Pinnacle: comparing Pareto fronts.
van Kesteren Z; Janssen TM; Damen E; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C
Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(10):2943-52. PubMed ID: 22516969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicriteria optimization: Site-specific class solutions for VMAT plans.
Guerrero M; Fellows Z; Mohindra P; Badiyan S; Lamichhane N; Snider JW; Chen S
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 31101570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tomotherapy-like versus VMAT-like treatments: a multicriteria comparison for a prostate geometry.
Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7418-29. PubMed ID: 23231292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy.
Buschmann M; Sharfo AWM; Penninkhof J; Seppenwoolde Y; Goldner G; Georg D; Breedveld S; Heijmen BJM
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Apr; 194(4):333-342. PubMed ID: 29270648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
