212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33458892)
21. Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: from theory to practice. Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety".
Sciacovelli L; O'Kane M; Skaik YA; Caciagli P; Pellegrini C; Da Rin G; Ivanov A; Ghys T; Plebani M;
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 May; 49(5):835-44. PubMed ID: 21342024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Targeting Rejection: Analysis of Specimen Acceptability and Rejection, and Framework for Identifying Interventions in a Single Tertiary Healthcare Facility.
Rooper L; Carter J; Hargrove J; Hoffmann S; Riedel S
J Clin Lab Anal; 2017 May; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 27629723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. National survey on the pre-analytical variability in a representative cohort of Italian laboratories.
Lippi G; Montagnana M; Giavarina D; ; ;
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(12):1491-4. PubMed ID: 17163828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A 3-year-long investigation of the authenticity of the return results of hepatitis B virus qualitative testing in external quality assessment in East China.
Song C; Shan Z; Kang F; Li W
J Med Virol; 2019 Jun; 91(6):1076-1080. PubMed ID: 30761566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.
Ricós C; García-Victoria M; de la Fuente B
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 15259371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality Indicators for the Total Testing Process.
Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Aita A
Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):187-205. PubMed ID: 28153366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A pilot study for establishing quality indicators in molecular diagnostics according to the IFCC WG-LEPS initiative: preliminary findings in China.
Zhou R; Wei Y; Sciacovelli L; Plebani M; Wang Q
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 May; 57(6):822-831. PubMed ID: 30838838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the pre-analytical phase.
Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Aita A; Pelloso M; Chiozza ML
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):943-8. PubMed ID: 25719322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A pragmatic approach to sample acceptance and rejection.
Cadamuro J; Simundic AM; Ajzner E; Sandberg S
Clin Biochem; 2017 Jul; 50(10-11):579-581. PubMed ID: 28163015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk assessment of the total testing process based on quality indicators with the Sigma metrics.
Xia Y; Wang X; Yan C; Wu J; Xue H; Li M; Lin Y; Li J; Ji L
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 58(8):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 32146438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Classification of reasons for rejection of biological specimens based on pre-preanalytical processes to identify quality indicators at a university hospital clinical laboratory in Turkey.
Sinici Lay I; Pınar A; Akbıyık F
Clin Biochem; 2014 Aug; 47(12):1002-5. PubMed ID: 24794787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pre-analytical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: Performance of laboratories participating in the IFCC working group "Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety" project.
Sciacovelli L; Lippi G; Sumarac Z; Del Pino Castro IG; Ivanov A; De Guire V; Coskun C; Aita A; Padoan A; Plebani M;
Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Oct; 497():35-40. PubMed ID: 31295446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of four quality indicators of the Pre-Analytical Phase External Quality Assessment Subprogram of the Fundación Bioquímica Argentina.
Unger G; Benozzi SF; Girardi R; Pennacchiotti GL
EJIFCC; 2023 Oct; 34(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 37868086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. External quality assessment of medical laboratories in Croatia: preliminary evaluation of post-analytical laboratory testing.
Krleza JL; Dorotic A; Grzunov A
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Feb; 27(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 28392737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Benefits of a comprehensive quality program for cryopreserved PBMC covering 28 clinical trials sites utilizing an integrated, analytical web-based portal.
Ducar C; Smith D; Pinzon C; Stirewalt M; Cooper C; McElrath MJ; Hural J;
J Immunol Methods; 2014 Jul; 409():9-20. PubMed ID: 24709391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preanalytical external quality assessment of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and CROQALM: finding undetected weak spots.
Nikolac N; Krleza JL; Simundic AM
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Feb; 27(1):131-143. PubMed ID: 28392736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Determining the rate and reasons for specimen rejection among specimens referred for HIV viral load determination through referral linkage to Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, north-central, Ethiopia,2023: Retrospective study.
Berhan A; Almaw A; Damtie S; Solomon Y; Legese B; Getie B; Erkihun M
Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e31736. PubMed ID: 38845923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Causes and impact of specimen rejection in a clinical chemistry laboratory.
Cao L; Chen M; Phipps RA; Del Guidice RE; Handy BC; Wagar EA; Meng QH
Clin Chim Acta; 2016 Jul; 458():154-8. PubMed ID: 27166198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of laboratory staff training workshops on coagulation specimen rejection rates.
du Toit M; Chapanduka ZC; Zemlin AE
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0268764. PubMed ID: 35657929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
