These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33459027)

  • 41. The use of the acute Pd/Pa drop after intracoronary nitroglycerin infusion to rule out significant FFR: CANICA (Can intracoronary nitroglycerin predict fractional flow reserve without adenosine?) multicenter study.
    Martin-Reyes R; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Franco-Pelaez J; Lopez-Palop R; Telleria Arrieta M; Amat Santos IJ; Carrillo Saez P; Sanchez-Recalde A; Sanmartin Pena JC; Garcia Camarero T; Brugaletta S; Gimeno de Carlos F; Pinero A; Sorto Sanchez DC; Frutos A; Lasa Larraya G; Navarro F; Farre J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 26213338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Discordance Between Resting and Hyperemic Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity: The VERIFY 2 Study (A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography).
    Hennigan B; Oldroyd KG; Berry C; Johnson N; McClure J; McCartney P; McEntegart MB; Eteiba H; Petrie MC; Rocchiccioli P; Good R; Lindsay MM; Hood S; Watkins S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27834663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation using the index of microcirculatory resistance: description and validation of an animal model.
    Fiarresga A; Selas M; Oliveira E; Cavaco-Gonçalves S; Cacela D; Carrapiço B; Cardim N; Cruz Ferreira R
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 33(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 24793616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
    Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of increasing doses of intracoronary adenosine on the assessment of fractional flow reserve.
    De Luca G; Venegoni L; Iorio S; Giuliani L; Marino P
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Oct; 4(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 22017932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Value and limitations of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary flow reserve.
    Zijlstra F; Juillière Y; Serruys PW; Roelandt JR
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 3180211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is Caffeine Abstention Necessary Before Adenosine-Induced Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement?
    Matsumoto H; Ushimaru S; Matsuda T; Shimada T; Mikuri M; Takahashi H; Takahashi N; Kawada T; Yamazaki T
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 66(17):1943-5. PubMed ID: 26493668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Variability of fractional flow reserve according to the methods of hyperemia induction.
    Lim WH; Koo BK; Nam CW; Doh JH; Park JJ; Yang HM; Park KW; Kim HS; Takashima H; Waseda K; Amano T; Kato D; Kurita A; Oi M; Toyofuku M; van Nunen L; Pijls NH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 85(6):970-6. PubMed ID: 25413590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Adverse Plaque Characteristics Relate More Strongly With Hyperemic Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Than With Resting Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
    Driessen RS; de Waard GA; Stuijfzand WJ; Raijmakers PG; Danad I; Bom MJ; Min JK; Leipsic JA; Ahmadi A; van de Ven PM; Knuuti J; van Rossum AC; Davies JE; van Royen N; Narula J; Knaapen P
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 13(3):746-756. PubMed ID: 31422133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of effectiveness of high-dose intracoronary adenosine versus intravenous administration on the assessment of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary heart disease.
    López-Palop R; Carrillo P; Frutos A; Cordero A; Agudo P; Mashlab S; Bertomeu-Martínez V
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 May; 111(9):1277-83. PubMed ID: 23415635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Coronary microvascular response to intracoronary administration of nicorandil.
    Hongo M; Takenaka H; Uchikawa S; Nakatsuka T; Watanabe N; Sekiguchi M
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Feb; 75(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 7832132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Resting Coronary Flow Varies With Normal Cardiac Catheter Laboratory Stimuli.
    Modi BN; Rahman H; Arri S; Ellis H; Mills MT; Williams R; Asrress K; Clapp B; Redwood S; Perera D
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Aug; 20(8):669-673. PubMed ID: 30415969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A randomized comparison of 4 doses of intracoronary adenosine in the assessment of fractional flow reserve.
    Casella G; Rieber J; Schiele TM; Stempfle HU; Siebert U; Leibig M; Theisen K; Buchmeier U; Klauss V
    Z Kardiol; 2003 Aug; 92(8):627-32. PubMed ID: 12955409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Adenosine intracoronary bolus dose escalation versus intravenous infusion to induce maximum coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve assessment.
    Legutko J; Kleczyński P; Dziewierz A; Rzeszutko Ł; Dudek D
    Kardiol Pol; 2019 Jun; 77(6):610-617. PubMed ID: 31241047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contrast Fractional Flow Reserve (cFFR): A pragmatic response to the call for simplification of invasive functional assessment.
    Leone AM; Lassandro Pepe F; Arioti M; Crea F
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 268():45-50. PubMed ID: 30041802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Intravenous nicorandil versus adenosine for fractional flow reserve measurement: a crossover, randomized study.
    Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Nagashima K; Hanaoka H; Kobayashi Y
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1570-1575. PubMed ID: 29858919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pooled comparison of regadenoson versus adenosine for measuring fractional flow reserve and coronary flow in the catheterization laboratory.
    Stolker JM; Lim MJ; Shavelle DM; Morris DL; Angiolillo DJ; Guzman LA; Kennedy KF; Weber E; Zareh M; Neumayr RH; Zenni MM
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(5):266-71. PubMed ID: 26242981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Efficacy of contrast medium induced Pd/Pa ratio in predicting functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve: insights from the RINASCI study.
    Leone AM; Scalone G; De Maria GL; Tagliaferro F; Gardi A; Clemente F; Basile E; Cialdella P; De Caterina AR; Porto I; Aurigemma C; Burzotta F; Niccoli G; Trani C; Rebuzzi AG; Crea F
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 25007836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Jeremias A; Whitbourn RJ; Filardo SD; Fitzgerald PJ; Cohen DJ; Tuzcu EM; Anderson WD; Abizaid AA; Mintz GS; Yeung AC; Kern MJ; Yock PG
    Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 11011341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Temporal dissociation between the minimal distal-to-aortic pressure ratio and peak hyperemia during intravenous adenosine infusion.
    Casadonte L; Marques KM; Spaan JAE; Siebes M
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2017 May; 312(5):H992-H1001. PubMed ID: 28213403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.