187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33459090)
1. A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients.
Han G; Li J; Wang S; Wang L; Zhou Y; Liu Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):300060520982708. PubMed ID: 33459090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.
Holte MB; Sæderup H; Pinholt EM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210499. PubMed ID: 35143288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and reliability of mandibular digital model registration with use of the mucogingival junction as the reference.
Ioshida M; Muñoz BA; Rios H; Cevidanes L; Aristizabal JF; Rey D; Kim-Berman H; Yatabe M; Benavides E; Alvarez MA; Volk S; Ruellas AC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):351-360. PubMed ID: 30472195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Han G; Li J; Wang S; Liu Y; Wang X; Zhou Y
Korean J Orthod; 2019 Mar; 49(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 30941296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients.
Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Franchi L; Ruellas A; Jackson T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):747-754. PubMed ID: 29706223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches.
Nada RM; Maal TJ; Breuning KH; Bergé SJ; Mostafa YA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16520. PubMed ID: 21347419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D Mandibular Superimposition: Comparison of Regions of Reference for Voxel-Based Registration.
Ruellas AC; Yatabe MS; Souki BQ; Benavides E; Nguyen T; Luiz RR; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157625. PubMed ID: 27336366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and reproducibility of CBCT assessment of mandibular changes before and after treatment for Class III growing patients - an easy and quick way for evaluation.
Hu X; Cheung GSP; Zhang Y; Sun R; Dong F
BMC Pediatr; 2023 Nov; 23(1):602. PubMed ID: 38017394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid 3D mandibular superimposition for growing patients.
Koerich L; Weissheimer A; de Menezes LM; Lindauer SJ
Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27767348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional measurement accuracy of 3-dimensional models from cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes.
Mukhia N; Birur NP; Shubhasini AR; Shubha G; Keerthi G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Sep; 132(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 34246615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling.
Verhelst PJ; Shaheen E; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Van der Cruyssen F; Shujaat S; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Swennen G; Politis C; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190364. PubMed ID: 31674794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.
Eliliwi M; Bazina M; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 31549857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.
Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Koerich L; Pham J; Cevidanes LH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1188-96. PubMed ID: 25935632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear measurements of sinus floor elevation based on voxel-based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography images.
Huang J; Hu J; Luo R; Xie S; Wang Z; Ye Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 31392828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
