These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33459597)
1. Evaluation of the Liver Disease Information in Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Longitudinal Study. Sun F; Yang F; Zheng S J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e17680. PubMed ID: 33459597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the digestive system malignancy information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: a longitudinal study. Luo J; Ma J; Xu L; Wang P; Zhang M; Xu M Ann Transl Med; 2022 Oct; 10(20):1112. PubMed ID: 36388827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Medical Information on Male Sexual Dysfunction on Baidu Encyclopedia and Wikipedia: Comparative Study. Ma M; Yin S; Zhu M; Fan Y; Wen X; Lin T; Song T J Med Internet Res; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e37339. PubMed ID: 35943768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of medical information on irritable bowel syndrome information in Wikipedia and Baidu Encyclopedia: comparative study. Li X; Chen K; Jia Y; Yin F; Wen X; Wang C; Li Z; Zhang H PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17264. PubMed ID: 38803580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China. Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students? Azer SA; AlSwaidan NM; Alshwairikh LA; AlShammari JM BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e008187. PubMed ID: 26443650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis. Farič N; Potts HW; Heilman JM J Med Internet Res; 2024 Sep; 26():e47562. PubMed ID: 39264697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the quality of information available on the internet on vaginal meshes. Furtado Meinberg M; Cardoso Brandão W; Andrade Werneck R; Zarnowski Passos M; da Silva-Filho AL Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():330-335. PubMed ID: 34365137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of Wikipedia as a resource for patient education in nephrology. Thomas GR; Eng L; de Wolff JF; Grover SC Semin Dial; 2013; 26(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 23432369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Information on the Chinese Internet: Website Evaluation Study. Wang Q; Liu L; Li H; Zhang Q; Ma Q JMIR Form Res; 2024 Aug; 8():e56594. PubMed ID: 39088820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus. Hu X; Pan H; He W; Hua H; Yan Z BMC Oral Health; 2017 Dec; 17(1):170. PubMed ID: 29284468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Online Information on Electronic Cigarettes: Comparative Study of Relevant Websites From Baidu and Google Search Engines. Chen T; Gentry S; Qiu D; Deng Y; Notley C; Cheng G; Song F J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jan; 22(1):e14725. PubMed ID: 32012069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is Wikipedia a complete and accurate source for musculoskeletal anatomy? London DA; Andelman SM; Christiano AV; Kim JH; Hausman MR; Kim JM Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1187-1192. PubMed ID: 31264001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites. Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability and quality of Wikipedia articles on pelvic floor disorders. Handler SJ; Eckhardt SE; Takashima Y; Jackson AM; Truong C; Yazdany T Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Dec; 32(12):3249-3258. PubMed ID: 33797592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. Heilman JM; West AG J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e62. PubMed ID: 25739399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can pharmacy students use Wikipedia as a learning resource? Critical assessment of articles on chemotherapeutic drugs. Azer SA; Alsharafi AA Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Jun; 47(2):333-345. PubMed ID: 36951631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of gastroenterology and hepatology articles on Wikipedia: are they suitable as learning resources for medical students? Azer SA Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 26(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 24276492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment. Watad A; Bragazzi NL; Brigo F; Sharif K; Amital H; McGonagle D; Shoenfeld Y; Adawi M J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e260. PubMed ID: 28720555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Quality of Otolaryngology Information on Persian Websites. Kouhi A; Dabiri S; Mohseni A; Kouchakinezhad Eramsadati M Iran J Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jul; 32(111):237-241. PubMed ID: 32850512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]