These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33461489)

  • 1. Vector space algebra for scaling and centering relationship matrices under non-Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium conditions.
    Gomez-Raya L; Rauw WM; Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Jan; 53(1):7. PubMed ID: 33461489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
    Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
    Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of genetic drift on variance components under a general model of epistasis.
    Barton NH; Turelli M
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2111-32. PubMed ID: 15562679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian characterization of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium.
    Shoemaker J; Painter I; Weir BS
    Genetics; 1998 Aug; 149(4):2079-88. PubMed ID: 9691059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the mode of inheritance in genetic association studies of qualitative traits based on the degree of dominance index.
    Zintzaras E; Santos M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Dec; 11():171. PubMed ID: 22188898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state matrices that are used for genetic evaluation and estimation of variance components.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Sun X; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):213-223. PubMed ID: 28508481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and homogeneity of disequilibrium across strata.
    Schaid DJ; Batzler AJ; Jenkins GD; Hildebrandt MA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 79(6):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17186465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiallelic models of genetic effects and variance decomposition in non-equilibrium populations.
    Álvarez-Castro JM; Yang RC
    Genetica; 2011 Sep; 139(9):1119-34. PubMed ID: 22068562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A unified framework integrating parent-of-origin effects for association study.
    Xiao F; Ma J; Amos CI
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72208. PubMed ID: 23991061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.
    Muñoz PR; Resende MF; Gezan SA; Resende MD; de Los Campos G; Kirst M; Huber D; Peter GF
    Genetics; 2014 Dec; 198(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 25324160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Oct; 7(10):3405-3414. PubMed ID: 28842396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust, flexible, and scalable tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium across diverse ancestries.
    Kwong AM; Blackwell TW; LeFaive J; de Andrade M; Barnard J; Barnes KC; Blangero J; Boerwinkle E; Burchard EG; Cade BE; Chasman DI; Chen H; Conomos MP; Cupples LA; Ellinor PT; Eng C; Gao Y; Guo X; Irvin MR; Kelly TN; Kim W; Kooperberg C; Lubitz SA; Mak ACY; Manichaikul AW; Mathias RA; Montasser ME; Montgomery CG; Musani S; Palmer ND; Peloso GM; Qiao D; Reiner AP; Roden DM; Shoemaker MB; Smith JA; Smith NL; Su JL; Tiwari HK; Weeks DE; Weiss ST; ; ; Scott LJ; Smith AV; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M; Kang HM
    Genetics; 2021 May; 218(1):. PubMed ID: 33720349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.
    Forni S; Aguilar I; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jan; 43(1):1. PubMed ID: 21208445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 26712858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic dissection of maternal, additive and non-additive genetic effects for growth and carcass traits in Nile tilapia.
    Joshi R; Meuwissen THE; Woolliams JA; Gjøen HM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 31941436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exact Inference for Hardy-Weinberg Proportions with Missing Genotypes: Single and Multiple Imputation.
    Graffelman J; Nelson S; Gogarten SM; Weir BS
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Sep; 5(11):2365-73. PubMed ID: 26377959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.