249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33461529)
1. Interventions to prevent anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Grigor EJM; Kaaki S; Fergusson DA; Maziak DE; Seely AJE
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 33461529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy.
Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD008446. PubMed ID: 25274134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.
Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD008446. PubMed ID: 23152259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Omentoplasty Decreases Leak Rate After Esophagectomy: a Meta-analysis.
Tuo G; Jin G; Pang Y; Wang W; Zhu X; Zhang H; Yang Y; Wu P; Zhu Z
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(6):1237-1243. PubMed ID: 31197696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty following gastrointestinal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wiggins T; Markar SR; Arya S; Hanna GB
Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 26116395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Markar SR; Arya S; Karthikesalingam A; Hanna GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 20(13):4274-81. PubMed ID: 23943033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a meta-analysis.
Chen L; Liu F; Wang K; Zou W
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 25220157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early oral intake and early removal of nasogastric tube post-esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kaaki S; Grigor EJM; Maziak DE; Seely AJE
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1538. PubMed ID: 34494402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23001084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction.
Vetter D; Gutschow CA
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2020 Dec; 405(8):1069-1077. PubMed ID: 32651652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Omentoplasty to reduce anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis.
Sahebally SM; Chan E; Azmir A; Lu CT; Doudle M; Naik A; Nolan G; Von Papen M
ANZ J Surg; 2022 Jul; 92(7-8):1651-1657. PubMed ID: 35170188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
