151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33462645)
1. Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Omiya Y; Onishi H
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 33462645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of radioactivity outside the field of view on image quality of dedicated breast positron emission tomography: preliminary phantom and clinical studies.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Ikegawa C; Hirata K; Abo N; Kusuzaki M; Oyama-Manabe N; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Dec; 36(12):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 36207497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of the fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose dose for clinically dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Satoh Y; Sekine T; Omiya Y; Onishi H; Motosugi U
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):21. PubMed ID: 31784863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance evaluation of a high resolution dedicated breast PET scanner.
García Hernández T; Vicedo González A; Ferrer Rebolleda J; Sánchez Jurado R; Roselló Ferrando J; Brualla González L; Granero Cabañero D; Del Puig Cozar Santiago M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2261. PubMed ID: 27147338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal relaxation parameters of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm and post-smoothing filter for image reconstruction of dedicated breast PET.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Hirata K; Asakawa Y; Ikegawa C; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 33772738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT.
Nishimatsu K; Nakamoto Y; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():138-145. PubMed ID: 28583624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Numerical observer study of lesion detection.
Raylman RR; Stolin A; Hays S; Johnson E; Lankas S; Mekonnen M; Roemer K
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7489-7496. PubMed ID: 36219487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Texture Analysis in the Diagnosis of Primary Breast Cancer: Comparison of High-Resolution Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography (dbPET) and Whole-Body PET/CT.
Satoh Y; Hirata K; Tamada D; Funayama S; Onishi H
Front Med (Lausanne); 2020; 7():603303. PubMed ID: 33425949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models.
Satoh Y; Hanaoka K; Ikegawa C; Imai M; Watanabe S; Morimoto-Ishikawa D; Onishi H; Ito T; Komoike Y; Ishii K
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality evaluation of real low-dose breast PET.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Ikegawa C; Onishi H
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):1186-1193. PubMed ID: 35612727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Hashimoto R; Akashi-Tanaka S; Watanabe C; Masuda H; Taruno K; Takamaru T; Ide Y; Kuwayama T; Kobayashi Y; Takimoto M; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2022 Nov; 29(6):1013-1021. PubMed ID: 35768684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distribution pattern of FDG uptake using ring-type dedicated breast PET in comparison to whole-body PET/CT scanning in invasive breast cancer.
Sakaguchi R; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Sugie T; Toi M; Mikami Y; Togashi K
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Aug; 33(8):570-578. PubMed ID: 31115856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which type of breast cancers is undetectable on ring-type dedicated breast PET?
Sasada S; Masumoto N; Goda N; Kajitani K; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():186-191. PubMed ID: 29859482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in the detection of small and low-grade breast cancer.
Sueoka S; Sasada S; Masumoto N; Emi A; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 33484374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dedicated breast PET value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions.
Graña-López L; Herranz M; Domínguez-Prado I; Argibay S; Villares A; Ruibal A; Vázquez-Caruncho M
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():201-207. PubMed ID: 30396656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility assessment of uptake on dedicated breast PET for noise discrimination.
Yuge S; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kataoka M; Matsumoto Y; Fujimoto K; Sugie T; Toi M; Nakamoto Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Feb; 37(2):121-130. PubMed ID: 36434200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image reconstruction using small-voxel size improves small lesion detection for positron emission tomography.
Rep S; Tomse P; Jensterle L; Jarabek L; Zaletel K; Lezaic L
Radiol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 56(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 35417108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
