181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33463007)
1. On marginal bone level changes around dental implants.
Coli P; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 23(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 33463007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up.
Finne K; Rompen E; Toljanic J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 17465347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
Pikner SS
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study.
Snauwaert K; Duyck J; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Naert I
Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Mar; 4(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11218510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten-year follow-up of dental implants used for immediate loading in the edentulous mandible: A prospective clinical study.
Windael S; Vervaeke S; Wijnen L; Jacquet W; De Bruyn H; Collaert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):515-521. PubMed ID: 29791063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of prosthetic design on the stability, marginal bone loss, peri-implant sulcus fluid volume, and nitric oxide metabolism of conventionally loaded endosseous dental implants: a 12-month clinical study.
Tözüm TF; Güncü GN; Yamalik N; Turkyilmaz I; Güncü MB
J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 18166093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence and pattern of implant fractures: A long-term follow-up multicenter study.
Lee JH; Kim YT; Jeong SN; Kim NH; Lee DW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):463-469. PubMed ID: 29761926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.
Kohal RJ; Patzelt SB; Butz F; Sahlin H
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 23506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal Bone Loss of Dental Implants in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Poorly Controlled HbA1c Values: A Long-Term Retrospective Study.
Lorean A; Ziv-On H; Perlis V; Ormianer Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):355-360. PubMed ID: 33909727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.
Koutouzis T; Fetner M; Fetner A; Lundgren T
J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20731584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Connections and Surfaces of Dental Implants on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study Over 7 to 19 Years.
Lee JH; Kim JC; Kim HY; Yeo IL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1195-1202. PubMed ID: 33270060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism.
Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 12507239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peri-implant bone loss around posterior mandible dental implants placed after distraction osteogenesis: preliminary findings.
Polo WC; de Araujo NS; Lima YB; Joly JC; Sendyk WR; Cury PR
J Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17274707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.
Berberi AN; Tehini GE; Noujeim ZF; Khairallah AA; Abousehlib MN; Salameh ZA
J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):521-7. PubMed ID: 24750449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasons for marginal bone loss around oral implants.
Qian J; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):792-807. PubMed ID: 23198697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients.
Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Oates TW
J Periodontol; 2009 May; 80(5):725-33. PubMed ID: 19405825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flap vs. flapless surgical techniques at immediate implant function in predominantly soft bone for rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective cohort study with follow-up of 1 year.
Maló P; Nobre Md
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 20467636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study.
Zweers J; van Doornik A; Hogendorf EA; Quirynen M; Van der Weijden GA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 24372952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
