256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33463029)
1. Partners' engagement in surveillance among survivors of colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.
Veenstra CM; Acosta J; Sharar R; Hawley ST; Morris AM
Cancer Med; 2021 Feb; 10(4):1289-1296. PubMed ID: 33463029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of dyadic studies examining relationship quality in couples facing colorectal cancer together.
Kayser K; Acquati C; Reese JB; Mark K; Wittmann D; Karam E
Psychooncology; 2018 Jan; 27(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27943551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How do couples and spouses/partners consider fertility preservation decisions during cancer treatment planning? A qualitative analysis of dyadic decision making.
Mathur A; Hoffman AS; Weston J; Crocker LC; Holman DA; Bradford A; Woodard TL
J Psychosoc Oncol; 2021; 39(2):268-284. PubMed ID: 33306007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associations Between Stress, Health Behaviors, and Quality of Life in Young Couples During the Transition to Survivorship: Protocol for a Measurement Burst Study.
Cho D; Roth M; Peterson SK; Jennings K; Kim S; Weathers SP; Ahmed S; Livingston JA; Barcenas C; You YN; Milbury K
JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Apr; 13():e53307. PubMed ID: 38652520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A dyadic approach to understanding the impact of breast cancer on relationships between partners during early survivorship.
Keesing S; Rosenwax L; McNamara B
BMC Womens Health; 2016 Aug; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 27561256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding the sexual health perceptions, concerns, and needs of female partners of prostate cancer survivors.
Gupta N; Zebib L; Wittmann D; Nelson CJ; Salter CA; Mulhall JP; Byrne N; Nolasco TS; Loeb S
J Sex Med; 2023 Apr; 20(5):651-660. PubMed ID: 36941211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of social support in posttreatment surveillance among African American survivors of colorectal cancer.
Le D; Holt CL; Pisu M; Brown-Galvan A; Fairley TL; Lee Smith J; White A; Hall IJ; Oster RA; Martin MY
J Psychosoc Oncol; 2014; 32(3):245-63. PubMed ID: 24611486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unmet needs and relationship challenges of head and neck cancer patients and their spouses.
Badr H; Herbert K; Reckson B; Rainey H; Sallam A; Gupta V
J Psychosoc Oncol; 2016; 34(4):336-46. PubMed ID: 27269579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Navigating sexual health in cancer survivorship: a dyadic perspective.
Gorman JR; Smith E; Drizin JH; Lyons KS; Harvey SM
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Nov; 28(11):5429-5439. PubMed ID: 32157507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A qualitative focus group study to identify the needs of survivors of stage II and III colorectal cancer.
Ho MY; McBride ML; Gotay C; Grunfeld E; Earle CC; Relova S; Tsonis M; Ruan JY; Chang JT; Cheung WY
Psychooncology; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1470-1476. PubMed ID: 26387559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dyadic survey study of partner engagement in and patient receipt of guideline-recommended colorectal cancer surveillance.
Veenstra CM; Ellis KR; Abrahamse P; Ward KC; Morris AM; Hawley ST
BMC Cancer; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1060. PubMed ID: 36229796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The implications of women's activity limitations and role disruptions during breast cancer survivorship.
Keesing S; Rosenwax L; McNamara B
Womens Health (Lond); 2018; 14():1745505718756381. PubMed ID: 29409399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gender and Role Differences in Couples' Communication During Cancer Survivorship.
Lim JW; Paek MS; Shon EJ
Cancer Nurs; 2015; 38(3):E51-60. PubMed ID: 25122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.
Reb A; Ruel N; Fakih M; Lai L; Salgia R; Ferrell B; Sampath S; Kim JY; Raz DJ; Sun V
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2017 Aug; 29():125-134. PubMed ID: 28720259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.
Chudyk AM; Stoddard R; McCleary N; Duhamel TA; Shimmin C; Hickes S; ; Schultz ASH
Res Involv Engagem; 2023 Nov; 9(1):106. PubMed ID: 38017570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Partners and close family members of long-term cancer survivors: health status, psychosocial well-being and unmet supportive care needs.
Turner D; Adams E; Boulton M; Harrison S; Khan N; Rose P; Ward A; Watson EK
Psychooncology; 2013 Jan; 22(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21905160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cancer survivors' and partners' key concerns and quality of life.
Dorros SM; Segrin C; Badger TA
Psychol Health; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1407-1427. PubMed ID: 29047300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of participation restrictions on everyday life in long-term colorectal cancer survivors in the EnCoRe study: A mixed-method study.
Breedveld-Peters JJL; Bours MJL; Cords CI; Ditters IAM; Habraken V; Jongen MWJ; Weijenberg MP
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2020 Apr; 45():101724. PubMed ID: 32044722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Associations between dyadic coping and supportive care needs: findings from a study with hematologic cancer patients and their partners.
Weißflog G; Hönig K; Gündel H; Lang D; Niederwieser D; Döhner H; Vogelhuber M; Mehnert A; Ernst J
Support Care Cancer; 2017 May; 25(5):1445-1454. PubMed ID: 27987096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experiences of living with advanced colorectal cancer from two perspectives - inside and outside.
Sjövall K; Gunnars B; Olsson H; Thomé B
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 21163701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
