168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33463588)
1. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonfunctional distractor analysis: An indicator for quality of Multiple choice questions.
Sajjad M; Iltaf S; Khan RA
Pak J Med Sci; 2020; 36(5):982-986. PubMed ID: 32704275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question Bank.
Rashwan NI; Aref SR; Nayel OA; Rizk MH
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Feb; 24(1):168. PubMed ID: 38383427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Gajjar S; Sharma R; Kumar P; Rana M
Indian J Community Med; 2014 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 24696535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
Al Ameer AY
Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Item analysis of in use multiple choice questions in pharmacology.
Kaur M; Singla S; Mahajan R
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2016; 6(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 27563581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions at the Department of Paediatrics, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Kheyami D; Jaradat A; Al-Shibani T; Ali FA
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2018 Feb; 18(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 29666684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Faculty Training on Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions.
Gupta P; Meena P; Khan AM; Malhotra RK; Singh T
Int J Appl Basic Med Res; 2020; 10(3):210-214. PubMed ID: 33088746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining the impact of specific types of item-writing flaws on student performance and psychometric properties of the multiple choice question.
Pham H; Besanko J; Devitt P
MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():225. PubMed ID: 38089249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An assessment of preclinical removable prosthodontics based on multiple-choice questions: Stakeholders' perceptions.
Shammas M; Nagda S; Shah C; Baxi G; Gadde P; Sachdeva S; Gupta D; Wali O; Dhall RS; Gajdhar S
J Dent Educ; 2024 May; 88(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 38314889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Student perception and post-exam analysis of one best MCQs and one correct MCQs: A comparative study.
Adhi MI; Aly SM
J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Apr; 68(4):570-575. PubMed ID: 29808047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
